e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 0-28018
YAHOO! INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0398689
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, California 94089
(Address of principal executive
offices, including zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(408) 349-3300
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
þ Accelerated
filer
o Non-Accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2007
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
1,339,552,342
|
YAHOO!
INC.
Table of
Contents
2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
YAHOO!
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,575,854
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,920
|
|
|
$
|
3,142,909
|
|
|
$
|
3,369,770
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
645,767
|
|
|
|
683,012
|
|
|
|
1,303,710
|
|
|
|
1,396,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
930,087
|
|
|
|
1,014,908
|
|
|
|
1,839,199
|
|
|
|
1,973,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
325,845
|
|
|
|
390,430
|
|
|
|
657,005
|
|
|
|
757,849
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
208,743
|
|
|
|
281,086
|
|
|
|
426,320
|
|
|
|
520,586
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
131,909
|
|
|
|
133,258
|
|
|
|
260,214
|
|
|
|
288,423
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
34,003
|
|
|
|
25,177
|
|
|
|
64,861
|
|
|
|
52,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
700,500
|
|
|
|
829,951
|
|
|
|
1,408,400
|
|
|
|
1,619,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
229,587
|
|
|
|
184,957
|
|
|
|
430,799
|
|
|
|
353,984
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
36,090
|
|
|
|
30,736
|
|
|
|
71,526
|
|
|
|
66,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes,
earnings in equity interests and minority interests
|
|
|
265,677
|
|
|
|
215,693
|
|
|
|
502,325
|
|
|
|
420,171
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(122,698
|
)
|
|
|
(87,732
|
)
|
|
|
(225,630
|
)
|
|
|
(180,090
|
)
|
Earnings in equity interests
|
|
|
21,634
|
|
|
|
32,106
|
|
|
|
48,071
|
|
|
|
61,255
|
|
Minority interests in operations
of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
164,330
|
|
|
$
|
160,567
|
|
|
$
|
324,189
|
|
|
$
|
302,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
basic
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share
calculation basic
|
|
|
1,405,598
|
|
|
|
1,339,594
|
|
|
|
1,411,758
|
|
|
|
1,346,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share
calculation diluted
|
|
|
1,476,642
|
|
|
|
1,403,819
|
|
|
|
1,484,809
|
|
|
|
1,410,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
by function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
|
$
|
2,357
|
|
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
|
$
|
4,364
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
38,489
|
|
|
|
52,110
|
|
|
|
77,356
|
|
|
|
102,378
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
36,170
|
|
|
|
64,451
|
|
|
|
73,887
|
|
|
|
112,751
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,482
|
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
53,854
|
|
|
|
49,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
$
|
99,723
|
|
|
$
|
128,779
|
|
|
$
|
208,364
|
|
|
$
|
268,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
YAHOO!
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, in thousands
|
|
|
|
except par values)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,569,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,812
|
|
Short-term marketable debt
securities
|
|
|
1,031,528
|
|
|
|
865,325
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
930,964
|
|
|
|
891,621
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
217,779
|
|
|
|
361,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,750,142
|
|
|
|
3,644,649
|
|
Long-term marketable debt
securities
|
|
|
935,886
|
|
|
|
760,402
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,101,379
|
|
|
|
1,175,858
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,968,557
|
|
|
|
3,004,052
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
405,822
|
|
|
|
393,337
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
459,988
|
|
|
|
550,339
|
|
Investments in equity interests
|
|
|
1,891,834
|
|
|
|
1,962,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
11,513,608
|
|
|
$
|
11,491,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
109,130
|
|
|
$
|
142,552
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
1,046,882
|
|
|
|
923,044
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
317,982
|
|
|
|
341,504
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,473,994
|
|
|
|
2,156,732
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
|
|
64,939
|
|
|
|
61,170
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
749,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
36,890
|
|
|
|
36,451
|
|
Deferred and other long-term tax
liabilities, net
|
|
|
19,204
|
|
|
|
261,478
|
|
Minority interests in consolidated
subsidiaries
|
|
|
8,056
|
|
|
|
7,748
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par
value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 1,497,912 and
1,512,838 shares issued, respectively, and 1,360,247 and
1,340,626 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
8,615,915
|
|
|
|
9,041,370
|
|
Treasury stock at cost, 137,665
and 172,212 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(3,324,863
|
)
|
|
|
(4,339,992
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
3,717,560
|
|
|
|
4,066,855
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
150,505
|
|
|
|
197,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
9,160,610
|
|
|
|
8,967,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
11,513,608
|
|
|
$
|
11,491,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
YAHOO!
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
324,189
|
|
|
$
|
302,991
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
139,201
|
|
|
|
197,511
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
113,426
|
|
|
|
113,384
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
208,364
|
|
|
|
268,785
|
|
Tax benefits from stock-based
awards
|
|
|
227,820
|
|
|
|
164,655
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based awards
|
|
|
(215,944
|
)
|
|
|
(134,491
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(63,539
|
)
|
|
|
(90,839
|
)
|
Earnings in equity interests
|
|
|
(48,071
|
)
|
|
|
(61,255
|
)
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
|
15,156
|
|
Minority interests in operations
of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
(Gains) / losses from sales of
investments, assets, and other, net
|
|
|
(2,070
|
)
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities,
net of effects of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(53,355
|
)
|
|
|
43,365
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(15,963
|
)
|
|
|
(12,519
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
63,753
|
|
|
|
31,078
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
88,596
|
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
34,673
|
|
|
|
18,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
814,565
|
|
|
|
840,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and
equipment, net
|
|
|
(316,825
|
)
|
|
|
(262,695
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable debt
securities
|
|
|
(648,333
|
)
|
|
|
(993,039
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities
of marketable debt securities
|
|
|
845,674
|
|
|
|
1,344,752
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(55,329
|
)
|
|
|
(36,011
|
)
|
Other investing activities, net
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
(19,914
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
(175,457
|
)
|
|
|
33,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock, net
|
|
|
189,825
|
|
|
|
203,725
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(690,209
|
)
|
|
|
(1,015,129
|
)
|
Structured stock repurchases, net
|
|
|
(227,705
|
)
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based awards
|
|
|
215,944
|
|
|
|
134,491
|
|
Other financing activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(512,145
|
)
|
|
|
(928,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
34,567
|
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
161,530
|
|
|
|
(44,059
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
1,429,693
|
|
|
|
1,569,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
1,591,223
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
YAHOO!
INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow
disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisitions
|
|
$
|
63,006
|
|
|
$
|
41,767
|
|
Cash acquired in acquisitions
|
|
|
(7,677
|
)
|
|
|
(5,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,329
|
|
|
$
|
36,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, restricted stock and
stock options issued in connection with acquisitions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 Acquisitions for
additional information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
6
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
|
|
Note 1
|
THE
COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The Company. Yahoo! Inc. (together with
its consolidated subsidiaries, Yahoo! or the
Company) is a leading global Internet brand and one
of the most trafficked Internet destinations worldwide.
Yahoo!s mission is to connect people to their passions,
their communities, and the worlds knowledge. Yahoo! seeks
to provide Internet services that are essential and relevant to
its global audience of users and its advertisers. To its global
audience of users, Yahoo! provides its owned and operated online
properties and services (the Yahoo Properties). To
its advertisers, Yahoo! provides a range of tools and marketing
solutions designed to enable businesses to reach its community
of users through the Yahoo! Properties and to also reach the
users of its distribution network of third-party entities
(referred to as affiliates) who have integrated the
Companys search
and/or
display advertising offerings into their websites.
Basis of Presentation. The condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Yahoo!
and its majority-owned or otherwise controlled subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated. Investments in entities in which the Company can
exercise significant influence, but does not own a majority
equity interest or otherwise control, are accounted for using
the equity method and are included as Investments in equity
interests on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The
Company has included the results of operations of acquired
companies from the closing date of the acquisition. Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only
normal recurring items, which, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for
the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the
full year or for any future period.
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States (GAAP) requires management to make
estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including
those related to uncollectible receivables, the useful lives of
long-lived assets including property and equipment, investment
fair values, goodwill and other intangible assets, investments
in equity interests, income taxes, and contingencies. In
addition, the Company uses assumptions when employing the
Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value
of stock-based awards granted. The Company bases its estimates
of the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, when these
carrying values are not readily available from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
related notes included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed
or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 was
derived from the Companys audited financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2006, but does not include all
disclosures required by GAAP. However, the Company believes the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which clarifies
the definition of fair value, establishes guidelines for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures regarding fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair
value measurements but eliminates inconsistencies in
7
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements.
SFAS 157 will be effective for the Company on
January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of adopting SFAS 157 but does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS 157 will have a material impact on its
financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159), which permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159 will be
effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 159 but
does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a
material impact on its financial position, cash flows, or
results of operations.
|
|
Note 2
|
BASIC AND
DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE
|
Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period,
excluding any unvested restricted stock that is subject to
repurchase. Diluted net income per share is computed using the
weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive,
potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential
common shares consist of unvested restricted stock and
restricted stock units, collectively referred to as
restricted stock awards (using the treasury stock
method), the incremental common shares issuable upon the
exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method) and
the conversion of the Companys zero coupon senior
convertible notes (using the if-converted method). For the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, approximately
92 million and 133 million options to purchase common
stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculation, as they
were anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2007, approximately 88 million and 133 million
options to purchase common stock, respectively, were excluded
from the calculation, as they were anti-dilutive. See
Note 9 Short-Term Debt for
additional information related to the Companys zero coupon
senior convertible notes.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
164,330
|
|
|
$
|
160,567
|
|
|
$
|
324,189
|
|
|
$
|
302,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
1,410,285
|
|
|
|
1,343,411
|
|
|
|
1,416,536
|
|
|
|
1,350,183
|
|
Weighted average unvested
restricted stock subject to repurchase
|
|
|
(4,687
|
)
|
|
|
(3,817
|
)
|
|
|
(4,778
|
)
|
|
|
(4,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic calculation
|
|
|
1,405,598
|
|
|
|
1,339,594
|
|
|
|
1,411,758
|
|
|
|
1,346,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
5,779
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
32,678
|
|
|
|
21,010
|
|
|
|
34,851
|
|
|
|
22,392
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
36,585
|
|
|
|
36,571
|
|
|
|
36,585
|
|
|
|
36,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted calculation
|
|
|
1,476,642
|
|
|
|
1,403,819
|
|
|
|
1,484,809
|
|
|
|
1,410,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
basic
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
diluted
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
completed in 2006
Seven. On January 29, 2006, the
Company and Seven Network Limited (Seven), a leading
Australian media company, completed a strategic partnership in
which the Company contributed its Australian Internet
8
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
business, Yahoo! Australia and New Zealand (Yahoo!
Australia), and Seven contributed its online assets,
television and magazine content, an option to purchase its
33 percent ownership interest in mobile solutions provider
m.Net Corporation Ltd, and cash of $7 million. The Company
believes this strategic partnership and the contribution of the
respective businesses with their rich media and entertainment
content has created a comprehensive and engaging online
experience for local users and advertisers. The Company obtained
a 50 percent equity ownership interest in the newly formed
entity, which operates as Yahoo! 7. Pursuant to a
shareholders agreement and a power of attorney granted by Seven
to vote certain of its shares, the Company has the right to vote
50.1 percent of the outstanding voting interests in Yahoo!
7 and has control over the day-to-day operations and therefore
consolidates Yahoo! 7, which includes the operations of Yahoo!
Australia. For accounting purposes, the Company is considered to
have acquired the assets contributed by Seven in exchange for
50 percent of the ownership of Yahoo! Australia.
Accordingly, the Company accounted for this transaction in
accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations. The total purchase price was
$35 million including direct transaction costs of
$2 million.
The allocation of the purchase price of the Companys share
of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
fair values was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
$
|
3,763
|
|
Other tangible assets acquired
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts, related
relationships, developed technology and intellectual property
rights
|
|
|
18,600
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
16,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
40,793
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(6,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
34,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortizable intangible assets have useful lives not
exceeding seven years and a weighted average useful life of
seven years. No amounts have been allocated to in-process
research and development and approximately $16 million has
been allocated to goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and
intangible assets acquired and is not deductible for tax
purposes.
As a result of this transaction, the Companys ownership in
Yahoo! Australia, which is now part of Yahoo! 7, decreased to
50 percent. The Company effectively recognized a non-cash
gain of approximately $30 million representing the
difference between the fair value of Yahoo! Australia and its
carrying value adjusted for the Companys continued
ownership in Yahoo! 7. This non-cash gain was accounted for as a
capital transaction and recorded as additional paid-in capital
because of certain future events that could affect actual
realization of the gain. The Company also recorded a minority
interest of $7 million related to its reduced ownership of
Yahoo! Australia and Sevens retained interest in their
contributed net assets.
Investment in Gmarket Inc. During the
year ended December 31, 2006, the Company acquired shares
in Gmarket Inc., a leading retail
e-commerce
provider in South Korea, for $61 million, including direct
transaction costs of approximately $1 million. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company acquired
additional shares in Gmarket for $8 million. As of
June 30, 2007, the Company held an approximate
10 percent ownership interest in Gmarket, with an
investment cost base totaling $69 million.
Other Acquisitions Business
Combinations. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, the Company acquired three other
companies which were accounted for as business combinations. The
total purchase price for these three acquisitions was
$42 million and consisted of $41 million in cash
consideration and $1 million of direct transaction costs.
The total cash consideration of $41 million less cash
acquired of $1 million resulted in net cash outlay of
$40 million. Of the purchase price, $27 million was
allocated to goodwill, $21 million to amortizable
9
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
intangible assets and $6 million to net assumed
liabilities. In connection with these business combinations, the
Company also issued stock-based awards valued at
$23 million that will be recognized as compensation expense
over the next three years. Goodwill represents the excess of the
purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and
intangible assets acquired and is not deductible for tax
purposes.
The Company also completed immaterial asset acquisitions that
did not qualify as business combinations during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Transactions
completed in 2007
Other Acquisitions Asset
Acquisitions. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, the Company acquired three companies which
were accounted for as asset acquisitions. The total purchase
price for these acquisitions was $54 million and consisted
of $17 million in cash consideration, $36 million in
equity consideration and $1 million of direct transaction
costs. The total cash consideration of $17 million less
cash acquired of $3 million resulted in net cash outlay of
$14 million. For accounting purposes, approximately
$76 million was allocated to amortizable intangible assets,
$26 million to net assumed liabilities, primarily deferred
income tax liabilities, $1 million to tangible assets, and
$3 million to cash acquired. In connection with these
acquisitions, the Company also issued stock-based awards valued
at $19 million that will be recognized as expense over the
next three years.
The Company also completed immaterial business combinations
during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
See Note 15 Subsequent Events for
additional information related to the Companys acquisition
of Right Media Inc.
|
|
Note 4
|
INVESTMENTS
IN EQUITY INTERESTS
|
The following table summarizes the Companys investments in
equity interests (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Alibaba
|
|
$
|
1,411,651
|
|
|
$
|
1,414,801
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Yahoo! Japan
|
|
|
476,870
|
|
|
|
544,303
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,891,834
|
|
|
$
|
1,962,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Investment in Alibaba. On
October 23, 2005, the Company acquired approximately
46 percent of the outstanding common stock of Alibaba,
which represented approximately 40 percent on a fully
diluted basis, in exchange for $1.0 billion in cash, the
contribution of the Companys China based businesses,
including 3721 Network Software Company Limited (Yahoo!
China) and direct transaction costs of $8 million.
Pursuant to the terms of a shareholder agreement, the Company
has an approximate 35 percent voting interest in Alibaba,
with the remainder of its voting rights subject to a voting
agreement with Alibaba management. Other investors in Alibaba
include SOFTBANK Corp. (SOFTBANK). The investment in
Alibaba is being accounted for using the equity method, and the
total investment, including net tangible assets, identifiable
intangible assets and goodwill, is classified as part of
Investments in equity interests on the Companys condensed
consolidated balance sheets. The Company records its share of
the results of Alibaba and any related amortization expense, one
quarter in arrears, within earnings in equity interests on the
condensed consolidated statements of income.
Through this transaction, the Company has combined its leading
search capabilities with Alibabas leading online
marketplace and online payment system and Alibabas strong
local presence, expertise and vision in the China market. These
factors contributed to a purchase price in excess of the
Companys share of the fair value of Alibabas net
tangible and intangible assets acquired resulting in goodwill.
10
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The purchase price was based on acquiring a 40 percent
equity interest in Alibaba on a fully diluted basis. As of
June 30, 2007, the Companys ownership interest in
Alibaba was 44 percent, an approximate 2 percent
decrease from the initial investment, primarily as a result of
the conversion of Alibabas outstanding convertible debt in
April 2006. The Companys ownership interest in Alibaba may
now be further diluted to 39 percent upon exercise of
Alibabas employee stock options. The Company will
recognize non-cash gains if and when such further dilution to
its ownership interest in Alibaba occurs, as such reduction in
interest results in an incremental sale of Yahoo! China. In
allocating the excess of the carrying value of its investment in
Alibaba over its proportionate share of the net assets of
Alibaba, the Company allocated a portion of the excess to
goodwill to account for the estimated reductions in the carrying
value of the investment in Alibaba that may occur as the
Companys equity interest is diluted to 40 percent.
As of June 30, 2007, the difference between the
Companys carrying value of its investment in Alibaba and
its proportionate share of the net assets of Alibaba is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of investment in
Alibaba
|
|
$
|
1,414,801
|
|
Proportionate share of net assets
of Alibaba
|
|
|
936,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of carrying value of
investment over proportionate share of net assets
|
|
$
|
478,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The excess carrying value has been
primarily assigned to:
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
416,278
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets
|
|
|
64,038
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
478,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortizable intangible assets have useful lives not
exceeding seven years and a weighted average useful life of
approximately 5 years. No amount has been allocated to
in-process research and development. Goodwill is not deductible
for tax purposes.
The Company also has commercial arrangements with Alibaba to
provide technical, development, and advertising services. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, these
transactions were not material.
Equity Investment in Yahoo!
Japan. During April 1996, the Company signed
a joint venture agreement with SOFTBANK, which was amended in
September 1997, whereby Yahoo! Japan Corporation (Yahoo!
Japan) was formed. Yahoo! Japan was formed to establish
and manage a local version of Yahoo! in Japan. During the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, the Company received
cash dividends from Yahoo! Japan in the amounts of
$13 million and $15 million, before taxes,
respectively, which were recorded as reductions in the
Companys investment in Yahoo! Japan. The Company also has
commercial arrangements with Yahoo! Japan, consisting of
services, including algorithmic search services and sponsored
search services and the related traffic acquisition costs and
license fees. The net cost of these arrangements was
approximately $59 million and $80 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
The net cost of these arrangements was approximately
$119 million and $158 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
The investment in Yahoo! Japan is being accounted for using the
equity method and the total investment is classified as a part
of the Investments in equity interests balance on the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. The Company records its share of
the results of Yahoo! Japan one quarter in arrears within
earnings in equity interests on the condensed consolidated
statements of income. The fair value of the Companys
approximate 34 percent ownership interest in Yahoo! Japan,
based on the quoted stock price, was approximately
$6.9 billion as of June 30, 2007.
Prior to and during 2001, Yahoo! Japan acquired the
Companys equity interests in certain entities in Japan for
total consideration of approximately $65 million, paid
partially in shares of Yahoo! Japan common stock and
11
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
partially in cash. As a result of the acquisition, the Company
increased its investment in Yahoo! Japan, which resulted in
approximately $41 million of goodwill to be amortized over
seven years. The amortization ceased upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, on January 1, 2002. The carrying amount of
the Companys investment in Yahoo! Japan differs from the
amount of the underlying equity in net assets of Yahoo! Japan
primarily as a result of this goodwill.
The following table presents Yahoo! Japans condensed
financial information, as derived from the Yahoo! Japan
financial statements for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and as of
December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, respectively (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating data(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
402,601
|
|
|
$
|
482,360
|
|
|
$
|
800,120
|
|
|
$
|
945,352
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
388,381
|
|
|
$
|
463,882
|
|
|
$
|
749,653
|
|
|
$
|
909,050
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
201,805
|
|
|
$
|
247,490
|
|
|
$
|
381,912
|
|
|
$
|
482,706
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
111,148
|
|
|
$
|
133,948
|
|
|
$
|
218,975
|
|
|
$
|
262,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance sheet data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
739,540
|
|
|
$
|
977,868
|
|
Long-term assets
|
|
$
|
1,676,416
|
|
|
$
|
1,722,267
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
504,033
|
|
|
$
|
644,721
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
420,181
|
|
|
$
|
424,065
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The Company records its share of the results of Yahoo! Japan one
quarter in arrears in earnings in equity interests. |
The differences between United States and Japanese generally
accepted accounting principles did not materially impact the
amounts reflected in the Companys financial statements.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,658,879
|
|
|
$
|
1,309,678
|
|
|
$
|
2,968,557
|
|
Acquisitions and other(*)
|
|
|
(2,383
|
)
|
|
|
12,680
|
|
|
|
10,297
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,198
|
|
|
|
25,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,656,496
|
|
|
$
|
1,347,556
|
|
|
$
|
3,004,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Other primarily includes certain purchase price adjustments that
affect existing goodwill. |
12
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
Note 6
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS, NET
|
The following table summarizes the Companys intangible
assets, net (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Customer, affiliate, and
advertiser related relationships
|
|
$
|
96,599
|
|
|
$
|
279,063
|
|
|
$
|
(212,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
67,009
|
|
Developed technology and
intellectual property rights
|
|
|
210,446
|
|
|
|
488,918
|
|
|
|
(245,720
|
)
|
|
|
243,198
|
|
Trademark, trade name and domain
name
|
|
|
98,777
|
|
|
|
187,869
|
|
|
|
(104,739
|
)
|
|
|
83,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
405,822
|
|
|
$
|
955,850
|
|
|
$
|
(562,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
393,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, reflecting movement in
the currencies of the underlying entities, totaled approximately
$22 million as of June 30, 2007 since the acquisition
of these intangible assets. |
For both the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, the
Company recognized amortization expense for intangible assets of
$57 million, respectively. For both the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2007, the Company recognized amortization
expense for intangible assets of $113 million,
respectively. Based on the current amount of intangibles subject
to amortization, the estimated amortization expense for the
remainder of 2007 and each of the succeeding years is as
follows: six months ending December 31, 2007:
$110 million; 2008: $168 million; 2009:
$60 million; 2010: $34 million; 2011: $7 million
and cumulatively thereafter: $14 million.
Other income, net is comprised of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
$
|
37,924
|
|
|
$
|
33,701
|
|
|
$
|
73,401
|
|
|
$
|
71,838
|
|
Investment losses, net
|
|
|
(4,106
|
)
|
|
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
|
(3,335
|
)
|
|
|
(2,843
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
(2,808
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
$
|
36,090
|
|
|
$
|
30,736
|
|
|
$
|
71,526
|
|
|
$
|
66,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment losses, net include realized investment gains,
realized investment losses, foreign exchange transaction gains
and losses and impairment charges related to declines in values
of publicly traded and privately held companies judged to be
other than temporary.
13
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
Note 8
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
Comprehensive income, net of taxes, is comprised of (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
164,330
|
|
|
$
|
160,567
|
|
|
$
|
324,189
|
|
|
$
|
302,991
|
|
Change in net unrealized
gains/(losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax and
reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
7,330
|
|
|
|
(2,326
|
)
|
|
|
20,199
|
|
|
|
(11,203
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
85,331
|
|
|
|
36,379
|
|
|
|
100,068
|
|
|
|
58,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
92,661
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
120,267
|
|
|
|
47,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
256,991
|
|
|
$
|
194,620
|
|
|
$
|
444,456
|
|
|
$
|
350,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of accumulated
other comprehensive income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities, net of tax
|
|
$
|
21,800
|
|
|
$
|
10,597
|
|
Foreign currency translation, net
of tax
|
|
|
128,705
|
|
|
|
187,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
150,505
|
|
|
$
|
197,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2003, the Company issued $750 million of zero
coupon senior convertible notes (the Notes) due
April 1, 2008, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of
approximately $733 million after transaction fees of
$17 million, which have been deferred and are included on
the condensed consolidated balance sheets in other current
assets. As of June 30, 2007, $2.6 million of the
transaction fees remain to be amortized. The Notes were issued
at par and bear no interest. The Notes are convertible into
Yahoo! common stock at a conversion price of $20.50 per share,
which would result in the issuance of an aggregate of
approximately 37 million shares, subject to adjustment upon
the occurrence of specified events. Each $1,000 principal amount
of the Notes will initially be convertible into
48.78 shares of Yahoo! common stock.
The Notes are convertible prior to the final maturity date
(1) during any fiscal quarter if the closing sale price of
the Companys common stock for at least 20 trading days in
the 30
trading-day
period ending on the last trading day of the immediately
preceding fiscal quarter exceeded 110 percent of the
conversion price on that 30th trading day, (2) during
the period beginning January 1, 2008 through the maturity
date, if the closing sale price of the Companys common
stock on the previous trading day was 110 percent or more
of the then current conversion price, and (3) upon
specified corporate transactions. Upon conversion, the Company
has the right to deliver cash in lieu of common stock. The
Company may be required to repurchase all of the Notes following
a fundamental change of the Company, such as a change of
control, prior to maturity at face value. The Company may not
redeem the Notes prior to their maturity.
As of June 30, 2007, the market price condition for
convertibility of the Notes was satisfied with respect to the
fiscal quarter beginning on July 1, 2007 and ending on
September 30, 2007. During this period holders of the Notes
will be able to convert their Notes into shares of Yahoo! common
stock at the rate of 48.78 shares of Yahoo! common stock
for each Note. The Notes will also be convertible into shares of
Yahoo! common stock in subsequent fiscal quarters, if any, with
respect to which the market price condition for convertibility
is met.
As of June 30, 2007 the fair value of the Notes was
approximately $1.0 billion based on quoted market prices.
The shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes have been
included in the computation of diluted net income per
14
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
share since the Notes were issued. To the extent that holders of
the Notes do not exercise their conversion rights prior to the
maturity date of April 1, 2008, the Company will be
obligated to pay in cash the principal amount of any such Notes
that remain outstanding on such maturity date. Consequently, the
Notes have been classified as short-term debt in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007. The Notes
were misclassified as long-term debt in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 that was
included in the Companys second quarter earnings release
issued on July 17, 2007.
|
|
Note 10
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Stock Options. The Companys 1995
Stock Plan and other stock-based award plans assumed through
acquisitions are collectively referred to as the
Plans. Stock option activity under the
Companys Plans and the 1996 Directors Stock
Option Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is
summarized as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts
and as noted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
189,655
|
|
|
$
|
29.46
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
19,332
|
|
|
$
|
29.15
|
|
Options exercised(*)
|
|
|
(11,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
Options cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(18,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
34.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
179,268
|
|
|
$
|
29.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The Companys current practice is to issue new shares to
satisfy stock option exercises. |
As of June 30, 2007, there was $455 million of
unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to unvested
stock options which is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 3.20 years.
The fair value of option grants was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
15
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Restricted stock awards activity for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 is summarized as follows (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
12,281
|
|
|
$
|
34.53
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
$
|
28.66
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
28.61
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,813
|
)
|
|
$
|
32.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
19,789
|
|
|
$
|
31.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, there was $351 million of
unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to unvested
restricted stock awards which is expected to be recognized over
a weighted average period of 1.76 years.
Executive Retention Compensation
Arrangement. During 2006, the Compensation
Committee of the Companys Board of Directors approved a
three year performance and retention compensation arrangement
with Terry Semel, the Companys then Chief Executive
Officer (CEO). For each of the years 2006 to 2008,
as the CEO, Mr. Semel was eligible to receive a
discretionary annual bonus payable in the form of a fully vested
non-qualified stock option for up to 1 million shares with
an exercise price equal to the closing trading price of the
Companys common stock on the date of the grant.
On June 18, 2007, the executive retention compensation
arrangement was terminated due to Mr. Semels
resignation as the CEO of the Company. During the second quarter
of 2007, $16 million of stock-based compensation expense
recorded through March 31, 2007 related to forfeitures of
equity awards previously granted to Mr. Semel, was reversed.
|
|
Note 11
|
STOCK
REPURCHASE PROGRAMS
|
In March 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized
a stock repurchase program for the Company to repurchase up to
$3.0 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock over
the next five years, dependent on market conditions, share price
and other factors. The Company had substantially completed the
$3.0 billion authorized stock repurchase program as of
September 30, 2006.
In October 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a new stock repurchase program allowing it to
repurchase up to $3.0 billion of its outstanding shares of
common stock from time to time over the next five years,
depending on market conditions, share price, and other factors.
Repurchases may take place in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions, including derivative transactions, and
may be made under a
Rule 10b5-1
plan.
In the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
repurchased 34.5 million shares of common stock directly at
an average price of $29.39 per share. Total cash consideration
for the repurchased stock was $1,013 million.
In addition, upon the vesting of certain restricted stock awards
during the six months ended June 30, 2007, shares of such
vested stock were reacquired by the Company to satisfy tax
withholding obligations. This had the effect of a stock
repurchase by the Company of $2 million. The
69,000 shares repurchased reduced the number of shares
outstanding. These repurchased shares are recorded as part of
treasury stock. Treasury stock is accounted for under the cost
method.
As of June 30, 2007, there was an outstanding
$250 million structured stock repurchase transaction which
was entered into in the first quarter of 2007 and will mature in
the third quarter of 2007. On the maturity date, if the market
price of the Companys common stock is above $33.00, the
Company will have its investment returned with a premium and if
the market price of its common stock is at or below such
pre-determined price, the Company will
16
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
repurchase 8.4 million shares of its common stock at an
effective buy-back price of $29.80 per share. This outstanding
transaction is recorded in stockholders equity in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
See Note 15 Subsequent Events for
additional information.
|
|
Note 12
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Operating Lease Commitments. The
Company leases office space and data centers under operating
lease agreements with original lease periods of up to
23 years, expiring between 2007 and 2027.
A summary of gross and net lease commitments as of June 30,
2007 follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross lease
|
|
|
Sublease
|
|
|
Net lease
|
|
|
|
commitments
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
commitments
|
|
|
Six months ending
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
2009
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
2010
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
2011
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
2012
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Due after 5 years
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross and net lease
commitments
|
|
$
|
869
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Commitments. In connection
with contracts to provide sponsored search
and/or
display advertising services to affiliates, the Company is
obligated to make payments, which represent traffic acquisition
costs, to its affiliates. As of June 30, 2007, these
commitments totaled $177 million, of which $10 million
will be payable in the remainder of 2007, $43 million will
be payable in 2008, $63 million will be payable in 2009,
and $61 million will be payable in 2010.
Intellectual Property Rights. In
connection with the licensing of certain intellectual property,
the Company is obligated to invest up to $184 million
through July 2008. To the extent the licensed intellectual
property will benefit future periods, the Company will
capitalize such payments and amortize them over the useful life
of the related intellectual property.
Other Commitments. In the ordinary
course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of
varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business
partners and other parties with respect to certain matters,
including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the
Companys breach of agreements, services to be provided by
the Company, or from intellectual property claims made by third
parties. In addition, the Company has entered into
indemnification agreements with its directors and certain of its
officers that will require the Company, among other things, to
indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by
reason of their status or service as directors or officers. The
Company has also agreed to indemnify certain former officers,
directors and employees of acquired companies in connection with
the acquisition of such companies. The Company maintains
director and officer insurance, which may cover certain
liabilities arising from its obligation to indemnify its
directors and officers, and former directors and officers of
acquired companies, in certain circumstances. It is not possible
to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these
indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior
indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances
involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification
agreements may not be subject to maximum loss clauses.
Historically, the Company has not incurred material costs as a
result of obligations under these agreements and it has not
accrued any liabilities related to such indemnification
obligations in its condensed consolidated financial statements.
17
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Contingencies. From time to time, third
parties assert patent infringement claims against Yahoo!.
Currently, the Company is engaged in several lawsuits regarding
patent issues and has been notified of a number of other
potential patent disputes. In addition, from time to time the
Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the
ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged
infringement of trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and other
intellectual property rights, claims related to employment
matters, and a variety of other claims, including claims
alleging defamation, invasion of privacy, or similar claims
arising in connection with the Companys
e-mail,
message boards, auction sites, shopping services and other
communications and community features.
On May 24, 2001, Arista Records, Inc., Bad Boy Records, BMG
Music d/b/a The RCA Records Label, Capitol Records, Inc., Virgin
Records America, Inc., Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., UMG
Recordings, Inc., Interscope Records, Motown Record Company,
L.P., and Zomba Recording Corporation filed a lawsuit alleging
copyright infringement against LAUNCH Media, Inc.
(LAUNCH) in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs alleged, among
other things, that the consumer-influenced portion of
LAUNCHs LAUNCHcast service is interactive
within the meaning of Section 114 of the Copyright Act and
therefore does not qualify for the compulsory license provided
for by the Copyright Act. The Complaint sought declaratory and
injunctive relief and damages for the alleged infringement.
After the lawsuit was commenced, Yahoo! entered into an
agreement to acquire LAUNCH, which closed in August 2001, and
since that time LAUNCH has been a wholly owned subsidiary of
Yahoo!. Because LAUNCH settled the LAUNCH litigation as to all
other plaintiffs, BMG Music d/b/a/The RCA Records Label was the
sole remaining plaintiff in this proceeding. On April 27,
2007, after a two week jury trial, the jury returned a unanimous
verdict in favor of LAUNCH finding no liability. The plaintiff
has filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit.
On July 12, 2001, the first of several purported securities
class action lawsuits was filed in the United States District
Court, Southern District of New York against certain
underwriters involved in Overture Services Inc.s
(Overture) initial public offering, Overture, and
certain of Overtures current and former officers and
directors. The Court consolidated the cases against Overture.
Plaintiffs allege, among other things, violations of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
involving undisclosed compensation to the underwriters, and
improper practices by the underwriters, and seek unspecified
damages. Similar complaints were filed in the same court against
numerous public companies that conducted initial public
offerings of their common stock since the mid-1990s. All of
these lawsuits were consolidated for pretrial purposes before
Judge Shira Scheindlin. On April 19, 2002, plaintiffs filed
an amended complaint, alleging
Rule 10b-5
claims of fraud. On July 15, 2002, the issuers filed an
omnibus motion to dismiss for failure to comply with applicable
pleading standards. On October 8, 2002, the Court entered
an Order of Dismissal as to all of the individual defendants in
the Overture IPO litigation, without prejudice. On
February 19, 2003, the Court denied the motion to dismiss
the
Rule 10b-5
claims against certain defendants, including Overture. Overture
accepted a proposal for the settlement and release of claims
against the issuer defendants, including Overture. The
settlement was presented to the Court in June 2004. On
February 15, 2005, the Court issued an order granting
conditional preliminary approval of the settlement proposal. On
August 31, 2005, the Court issued an order confirming
preliminary approval of the settlement. On April 24, 2006,
the Court held a fairness hearing in connection with the motion
for final approval of the settlement. The Court has yet to issue
a ruling on the motion for final approval. The settlement
remains subject to a number of conditions, including final
approval of the Court. On December 5, 2006, the Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the Courts October
2004 order certifying a class in six test cases that were
selected by the underwriter defendants and plaintiffs in the
coordinated proceeding and on April 6, 2007 denied a
petition for rehearing of its order. Overture is not one of the
test cases and it is unclear what impact this will have on the
class in Overtures case. If the settlement does not occur,
and litigation against Overture continues, the Company intends
to defend the case vigorously.
On May 11, 2007, the first of two purported securities
class action lawsuits was filed against Yahoo! Inc. and certain
of its officers and members of the Board of Directors. The first
lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, Central
District of California by plaintiff Ellen Rosenthal Brodsky and
the second lawsuit was filed in the United States District
Court, Central District of California by plaintiff Manfred
Hacker. The plaintiffs allege, among
18
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
other things, violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
sections 10(b) and 20(a), as well as
Rule 10b-5.
The plaintiffs generally claim that Yahoo! issued false,
deceptive or misleading statements concerning its advertising
business, financial results, and sales and growth potential
between April 8, 2004 and July 18, 2006. The
complaints seek unspecified compensatory damages, injunctive
relief, costs and attorneys fees. The Company believes
these cases are without merit and intends to defend them
vigorously.
On May 15, 2007, the first of two shareholder derivative
actions was filed in the Superior Court of Santa Clara
County by plaintiff Greg Brockwell against certain officers and
members of the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Inc. purportedly on
behalf of Yahoo! Inc. The second derivative action was filed in
the United States District Court for the Central District of
California on June 14, 2007 by plaintiff Jill Watkins. The
derivative actions, which include allegations of substantially
identical facts to the purported securities class actions,
attempt to state various claims under California law for trading
by defendants on alleged material non-public information, and
allegations of breaches of fiduciary duties relating to
financial reporting, misappropriation of information, abuse of
control and waste of corporate assets. The federal derivative
action includes an additional claim for alleged violation of
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The
derivative actions seek unspecified damages, equitable and
injunctive relief, including, among other things, changes to
corporate governance and internal procedures, restitution and
disgorgement of profits and compensation received by defendants,
costs and attorneys fees.
The Company does not believe, based on current knowledge, that
any of the foregoing legal proceedings or claims are likely to
have a material adverse effect on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. However, the Company may
incur substantial expenses in defending against such claims. In
the event of a determination adverse to Yahoo! or its
subsidiaries, the Company may incur substantial monetary
liability, and be required to change its business practices.
Either of these could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
The Company manages its business geographically. The primary
areas of measurement and decision-making are the United States
and International. Management relies on an internal management
reporting process that provides revenue and segment operating
income before depreciation, amortization and stock-based
compensation expense for making financial decisions and
allocating resources. Segment operating income before
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense
includes income from operations before depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense. Management
believes that segment operating income before depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense is an
appropriate measure of evaluating the operational performance of
the Companys segments. However, this measure should be
considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior
to, income from operations or other measures of financial
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
The following tables present summarized information by segment
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,070,134
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,514
|
|
|
$
|
2,167,172
|
|
|
$
|
2,219,271
|
|
International
|
|
|
505,720
|
|
|
|
579,406
|
|
|
|
975,737
|
|
|
|
1,150,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,575,854
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,920
|
|
|
$
|
3,142,909
|
|
|
$
|
3,369,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Segment operating income before
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
340,598
|
|
|
$
|
362,337
|
|
|
$
|
675,867
|
|
|
$
|
703,855
|
|
International
|
|
|
116,260
|
|
|
|
111,292
|
|
|
|
215,923
|
|
|
|
229,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income
before depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
|
456,858
|
|
|
|
473,629
|
|
|
|
891,790
|
|
|
|
933,664
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(127,548
|
)
|
|
|
(159,893
|
)
|
|
|
(252,627
|
)
|
|
|
(310,895
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(99,723
|
)
|
|
|
(128,779
|
)
|
|
|
(208,364
|
)
|
|
|
(268,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
229,587
|
|
|
$
|
184,957
|
|
|
$
|
430,799
|
|
|
$
|
353,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
152,653
|
|
|
$
|
120,668
|
|
|
$
|
278,423
|
|
|
$
|
220,993
|
|
International
|
|
|
22,425
|
|
|
|
24,008
|
|
|
|
38,402
|
|
|
|
41,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures, net
|
|
$
|
175,078
|
|
|
$
|
144,676
|
|
|
$
|
316,825
|
|
|
$
|
262,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
975,510
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,435
|
|
International
|
|
|
125,869
|
|
|
|
139,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,101,379
|
|
|
$
|
1,175,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue is attributed to individual countries according to the
international online property that generated the revenue. No
single foreign country accounted for more than 10 percent
of revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2007.
The following table presents revenues for groups of similar
services (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Marketing services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned and Operated sites
|
|
$
|
752,414
|
|
|
$
|
886,643
|
|
|
$
|
1,468,982
|
|
|
$
|
1,703,989
|
|
Affiliate sites
|
|
|
633,831
|
|
|
|
599,389
|
|
|
|
1,298,117
|
|
|
|
1,250,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing services
|
|
|
1,386,245
|
|
|
|
1,486,032
|
|
|
|
2,767,099
|
|
|
|
2,954,651
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
189,609
|
|
|
|
211,888
|
|
|
|
375,810
|
|
|
|
415,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,575,854
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,920
|
|
|
$
|
3,142,909
|
|
|
$
|
3,369,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty of Income
Taxes (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company
recognized a
20
YAHOO!
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
$46 million increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of
retained earnings related to adjustments to certain unrecognized
tax benefits. At January 1, 2007, the Company had
approximately $620 million in total unrecognized tax
benefits.
The total unrecognized tax benefits of $620 million include
approximately $306 million related to a capital loss
resulting from a subsidiary restructuring transaction and
approximately $124 million related to research and
development tax credit carry-forwards attributable to the
exercise of employee stock options in prior years. These amounts
have been netted against the related deferred tax assets. The
remaining $190 million is recorded within deferred and
other long-term tax liabilities on the Companys condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2007.
The total unrecognized tax benefits of $620 million at
January 1, 2007 comprised $443 million that, if
recognized, would reduce the effective income tax rate in future
periods; $4 million that, if recognized, would result in a
reduction to goodwill; $104 million that, if recognized,
would result in a credit to additional paid-in capital; and
$69 million related to federal tax benefit on state
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized. However, one or more
of these unrecognized tax benefits could be subject to a
valuation allowance if and when recognized in a future period,
which could impact the timing of any related effective tax rate
benefit.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the
Company recorded an increase in its total unrecognized tax
benefits of approximately $31 million and $38 million,
respectively.
The Company recognizes interest
and/or
penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not
ultimately become payable, amounts accrued will be reduced and
reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision in
the period that such determination is made. The amount of
interest and penalties accrued upon the adoption of FIN 48
and at June 30, 2007 was immaterial.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States
(U.S.) on a federal basis and in many U.S. state and
foreign jurisdictions. The tax years 1995 to 2006 remain open to
examination by the major taxing jurisdictions in which the
Company is subject to tax. Over the next twelve months, our
existing tax positions are expected to generate an increase in
total unrecognized tax benefits.
|
|
Note 15
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
Stock Repurchase
Transactions. Subsequent to June 30,
2007, the Company repurchased approximately 4 million
shares of its common stock at an average price of $26.75 per
share, for a total of $100 million.
Right Media Acquisition. On
July 11, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of
Right Media Inc. (Right Media), an online
advertising exchange. The Company believes that the acquisition
of Right Media is a key step in executing the Companys
long term strategy to transform how online advertisers and
publishers connect to their target audience. The acquisition
followed the Companys 20 percent strategic investment
in Right Media in October 2006. Under the terms of the
agreement, the Company acquired all of the remaining equity
interests (including all outstanding options and restricted
stock units) in Right Media for an aggregate consideration of
approximately $650 million. Right Media stockholders were
generally paid in approximately equal parts cash and Yahoo!
common stock (approximately 8 million shares), and
outstanding Right Media options and restricted stock units were
assumed and are exercisable or will be paid in Yahoo! common
stock.
21
Item 2. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Forward-Looking
Statements
In addition to current and historical information, this Report
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements relate to our future operations, prospects, potential
products, services, developments and business strategies. These
statements can, in some cases, be identified by the use of terms
such as may, will, should,
could, would, intend,
expect, plan, anticipate,
believe, estimate, predict,
project, potential, or
continue or the negative of such terms or other
comparable terminology. This Report includes, among others,
forward-looking statements regarding our:
|
|
|
|
|
expectations about revenues for marketing services and fees;
|
|
|
|
expectations about growth in users;
|
|
|
|
expectations about cost of revenues and operating expenses;
|
|
|
|
expectations about effective tax rate;
|
|
|
|
expectations about our on-going strategic initiatives;
|
|
|
|
anticipated capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
evaluation of possible acquisitions of, or investments in,
businesses, products and technologies; and
|
|
|
|
expectations about positive cash flow generation and existing
cash and investments being sufficient to meet normal operating
requirements.
|
These statements involve certain known and unknown risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those expressed or implied in our
forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties
include, among others, those listed in Part II,
Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q.
We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any of
our forward-looking statements after the date of this Report to
reflect actual results or future events or circumstances.
Overview
We are a leading global Internet brand and one of the most
trafficked Internet destinations worldwide. Our mission is to
connect people to their passions, their communities, and the
worlds knowledge. We seek to provide Internet services
that are essential and relevant to our global audience of users
and advertisers. To our users, we provide our owned and operated
online properties and services (the Yahoo!
Properties). To our advertisers, we provide a range of
tools and marketing solutions designed to enable them to reach
our community of users through the Yahoo! Properties and our
distribution network of third-party entities (referred to as
affiliates) who have integrated our search
and/or
display advertising offerings into their websites.
We offer a broad range of innovative and high-quality Internet
products and services that are designed to provide our users
with the power to connect, communicate, create, access, and
share information online. We seek to provide efficient and
effective marketing services for advertisers to reach our global
audience of users. Our focus is on engaging more deeply with
users and increasing the user base on the Yahoo! Properties,
thereby enhancing value for our advertisers. We believe that we
can increase our existing and potential user base and our
users engagement on the Yahoo! Properties not only by
offering compelling Internet services, but also by effectively
integrating search, community, personalization and content to
create a more powerful user experience.
Many of our services are free to users. We generate revenues by
providing marketing services to advertisers across a majority of
Yahoo! Properties and on the websites of our affiliates and by
charging our users for premium services. We classify these
revenues as either marketing services or fees. The majority of
our offerings are available globally in more than
20 languages. We manage and measure our business
geographically. Our principal geographies are the United States
and International.
22
Second
Quarter Highlights
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
Our revenues for the second quarter of 2007 increased
8 percent year over year to $1.7 billion, with unique
users up 12 percent year over year, fee paying users up
18 percent year over year, and page views up
19 percent year over year. |
|
Income from Operations |
|
Our operating income for the second quarter of 2007 declined
primarily due to the year over year increase in operating
expenses of $129 million, compared to the same period in
2006. |
|
Stock Repurchases |
|
We repurchased 14.6 million shares of our common stock in
the second quarter of 2007 at an average price of $28.67 per
share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2006-2007
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2006-2007
|
|
Operating Highlights
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,575,854
|
|
|
$
|
1,697,920
|
|
|
$
|
122,066
|
|
|
$
|
3,142,909
|
|
|
$
|
3,369,770
|
|
|
$
|
226,861
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
229,587
|
|
|
$
|
184,957
|
|
|
$
|
(44,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
430,799
|
|
|
$
|
353,984
|
|
|
$
|
(76,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2006-2007
|
|
Cash Flow Highlights
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
814,565
|
|
|
$
|
840,303
|
|
|
$
|
25,738
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
$
|
(175,457
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,093
|
|
|
$
|
208,550
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
$
|
(512,145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(928,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
(416,528
|
)
|
We believe the search queries, page views, click-throughs and
the related marketing services and fees revenues that we
generate correlate to the number and activity level of users
across our offerings on the Yahoo! Properties and the activity
level on our affiliate network. In the fourth quarter of 2006,
we launched a new search marketing system, referred to as
Project Panama, and we are progressing with our migration plan
for our active advertisers worldwide on to the new system. We
believe the new search marketing system, including the new
ranking model which was launched in the United States in the
first quarter of 2007, will enable us to provide a more relevant
search experience to our users, more valuable customer leads to
advertisers, and additional opportunities to our affiliate and
distribution partners. By providing a platform for our users
that brings together our search technology, content, and
community while allowing for personalization and integration
across devices, we seek to become more essential to, increase
our share of, and deepen the engagement of, our users with our
products and services. We believe this deeper engagement of new
and existing users and our new search marketing system, coupled
with the growth of the Internet as an advertising medium will
increase our revenues for the remainder of 2007 over 2006.
23
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth selected information on our
results of operations as a percentage of revenues for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes,
earnings in equity interests and minority interests
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Earnings in equity interests
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Minority interests in operations
of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Revenues by groups of similar
services were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Marketing services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned and Operated sites
|
|
$
|
752,414
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
$
|
886,643
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,468,982
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,703,989
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Affiliate sites
|
|
|
633,831
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
599,389
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
1,298,117
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
1,250,662
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing services
|
|
$
|
1,386,245
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,486,032
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,767,099
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,954,651
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Fees
|
|
|
189,609
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
211,888
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
375,810
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
415,119
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,575,854
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,697,920
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,142,909
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,369,770
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Percent of total revenues. |
|
|
Marketing Services Revenues from Owned and Operated
Sites. Marketing services revenue from owned
and operated sites, or Yahoo! Properties, for the second quarter
of 2007 increased by $134 million, or 18 percent, as
compared to the same period in 2006. Marketing services revenue
from owned and operated sites for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 increased by $235 million, or
16 percent, as compared to the same period in 2006. Factors
leading to growth in overall marketing services revenue included
an increase in our user base and activity levels on the Yahoo!
Properties, which contributed to a higher volume of search
queries, page views and click-throughs. We expect marketing
services revenue from our owned and operated sites to continue
growing at a rate faster than total revenue.
24
Our number of unique users worldwide as of June 30, 2007
was approximately 12 percent higher than the number of
unique users as of June 30, 2006. Unique users refers to
our internal estimates of the number of people who visited the
Yahoo! Properties in a given month.
The number of page views (including searches) on the Yahoo!
Properties increased by approximately 19 percent and
20 percent in the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2006. The
increase in the volume of page views is attributable to an
increased number of users and the expanded offering of
properties.
The average revenue per page view (including searches) decreased
by approximately 1 percent and 3 percent in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared
to the same periods in 2006, primarily due to a shift toward
lower priced inventory offset by the positive impact of the new
search marketing system.
Marketing Services Revenues from Affiliate
Sites. Marketing services revenue from
affiliate sites for the second quarter of 2007 decreased
$34 million, or 5 percent, as compared to the same
period in 2006. Marketing services revenue from affiliate sites
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased
$47 million, or 4 percent, as compared to the same
period in 2006. The year over year decline was primarily due to
on-going network quality initiatives, as well as declining
revenues from our relationship with Microsoft Corporation
(Microsoft), which left our affiliate network during
2006. We expect marketing services revenues from our affiliate
sites to continue to decline as a percentage of overall
marketing services revenue.
The number of searches on our affiliate network sites increased
by approximately 11 percent and 4 percent in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, as
compared to the same periods in 2006. The increase in the volume
of searches can be attributed to the increased number of
affiliates which was offset by the loss of our affiliate
relationship with Microsoft.
The average revenue per search on the affiliate network
decreased by approximately 15 percent and 7 percent in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively,
compared to the same periods in 2006, primarily due to a decline
in revenue from certain affiliate sites and the impact of our
on-going traffic quality initiatives.
Fees Revenue. Fees revenue for the
second quarter of 2007 increased $22 million, or
12 percent, as compared to the same period in 2006. Fees
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased
$39 million, or 10 percent, as compared to the same
period in 2006. The year over year growth is associated with an
increase in the number of paying users for our fee-based
services, which numbered 16.9 million as of June 30,
2007, compared to 14.3 million as of June 30, 2006, an
increase of 18 percent. Our increased base of paying users
was due to growth in users across most of our offerings, with
the largest growth generated from new Internet broadband users.
Our fee-based services include Internet broadband services,
sports, music, games, personals, and premium mail offerings, as
well as our services for small businesses. Average monthly
revenue per paying user slightly decreased to the lower end of
our $3.00 to $3.50 range for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, compared to the same periods in 2006. The
decline in average monthly revenue per paying user reflects the
continued growth of paying users in our services with lower fees.
Costs and Expenses: Operating costs and
expenses were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
645,767
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
$
|
683,012
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,303,710
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,396,649
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
325,845
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
$
|
390,430
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
657,005
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
$
|
757,809
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
208,743
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
$
|
281,086
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
$
|
426,320
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
$
|
520,586
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
131,909
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
133,258
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
$
|
260,214
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
288,423
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
$
|
34,003
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,177
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
$
|
64,861
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,279
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percent of total revenues. |
25
Stock-based compensation expense was allocated as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
|
$
|
2,357
|
|
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
|
$
|
4,364
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
38,489
|
|
|
|
52,110
|
|
|
|
77,356
|
|
|
|
102,378
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
36,170
|
|
|
|
64,451
|
|
|
|
73,887
|
|
|
|
112,751
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,482
|
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
53,854
|
|
|
|
49,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
$
|
99,723
|
|
|
$
|
128,779
|
|
|
$
|
208,364
|
|
|
$
|
268,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 10 Stock-Based
Compensation in the condensed consolidated financial
statements as well as our Critical Accounting Policies,
Judgments and Estimates for additional information about
stock-based compensation.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues
consists of traffic acquisition costs (TAC) and
other expenses associated with the production and usage of the
Yahoo! Properties. TAC consists of payments made to affiliates
who have integrated our search
and/or
display advertising offerings into their websites and payments
made to companies that direct consumer and business traffic to
the Yahoo! Properties. Other cost of revenues consists of fees
paid to third parties for content included on our online media
properties, Internet connection charges, data center costs,
server equipment depreciation, technology license fees,
amortization of acquired intellectual property rights and
developed technology, and compensation related expenses
including stock-based compensation expense.
Cost of revenues was as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
TAC
|
|
$
|
453,199
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
$
|
454,154
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
932,556
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
$
|
942,928
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Other cost of revenues
|
|
|
192,568
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
228,858
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
371,154
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
453,721
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
645,767
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
$
|
683,012
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,303,710
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,396,649
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Percent of total revenues. |
|
|
Cost of revenues for the second quarter of 2007 increased
$37 million, or 6 percent, as compared to the same
period of 2006. The increase included $1 million of
additional TAC, as well as an increase of $36 million in
other costs of revenues. Cost of revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 increased $93 million, or
7 percent, as compared to the same period of 2006. The
increase included $10 million of additional TAC, as well as
an increase of $83 million in other cost of revenues.
The year over year increases in TAC of less than 1 percent
and 1 percent for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, respectively, were mainly driven by
decreases of 5 percent and 4 percent in marketing
services revenues from affiliate sites compared to the same
periods of 2006, respectively, offset by on-going increases in
TAC rates compared to the same periods of 2006.
The year over year increase for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 in other cost of revenues included increases
of $19 million in the depreciation of server equipment,
information technology assets and maintenance costs,
$4 million in Internet connection charges and data center
costs, and $13 million in amortization of developed
technology and intellectual property rights acquired through
acquisitions. The year over year increase for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 in other cost of revenues included
increases of $42 million in the depreciation of server
equipment, information technology assets and maintenance costs,
$12 million in Internet connection charges and data center
costs, and $20 million in amortization of developed or
acquired technology and intellectual property rights.
26
The increase in the depreciation of server equipment,
information technology assets and maintenance costs resulted
from our continued investments in information technology assets
and server equipment. Increased Internet connection charges and
data center costs supported our growing audience of users,
traffic, and new offerings on the Yahoo! Properties. The
increase in the amortization of developed technology and
intellectual property rights acquired resulted from our
continued investments in, and acquisitions of, businesses and
technology.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and
marketing expenses consist primarily of advertising and other
marketing related expenses, compensation related expenses
(including stock-based compensation expense), sales commissions
and travel costs. Sales and marketing expenses for the second
quarter of 2007 increased $65 million, or 20 percent,
as compared to the same period of 2006. Sales and marketing
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased
$101 million, or 15 percent, as compared to the same
period of 2006.
The year over year increases in sales and marketing expenses for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 were largely
due to increases in compensation expense. Compensation expense
increased approximately $46 million and $74 million
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively, including an additional $14 million and
$25 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation
expense, due to increases in our sales and marketing headcount
as we expanded our presence in certain territories to support
our growing advertiser base. Marketing and other expenses for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 increased
approximately $10 million and $17 million,
respectively, primarily due to a new marketing campaign in 2007.
Consulting services costs for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007 increased $7 million and
$11 million, respectively, primarily due to temporary
support required to assist with the implementation of Project
Panama.
Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues were
23 percent (including 3 percent related to stock-based
compensation expense) and 21 percent (including
2 percent related to stock-based compensation expense) for
the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Sales and
marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues were
22 percent (including 3 percent related to stock-based
compensation expense) and 21 percent (including
2 percent related to stock-based compensation expense) for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Product Development. Product
development expenses consist primarily of compensation related
expenses (including stock-based compensation expense) incurred
for the development of, enhancements to and maintenance of the
Yahoo! Properties, classification and organization of listings
within the Yahoo! Properties, research and development, and
Yahoo!s technology platforms and infrastructure.
Depreciation expense and other operating costs are also included
in product development.
Product development expenses for the second quarter of 2007
increased $72 million, or 35 percent, as compared to
the same period of 2006. Product development expenses for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 increased $94 million,
or 22 percent, as compared to the same period of 2006.
Approximately $65 million and $93 million of the
increase for the three and six month periods, respectively, were
related to compensation expense including an additional
$28 million and $39 million of stock-based
compensation expense, respectively, (including an
$8 million incremental increase to stock-based compensation
expense related to the departure of an executive officer during
the second quarter of 2007). The increased compensation expense
reflected our continued hiring of engineering talent to further
develop and enhance new and existing offerings and services on
the Yahoo! Properties. Additionally, depreciation increased
$8 million and $10 million mainly due to our continued
investments in information technology assets and server
equipment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively.
Product development expenses as a percentage of revenues were
17 percent (including 4 percent related to stock-based
compensation expense) and 13 percent (including
2 percent related to stock-based compensation expense) for
the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Product
development expenses as a percentage of revenues were
15 percent (including 3 percent related to stock-based
compensation expense) and 14 percent (including
2 percent related to stock-based compensation expense) for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
27
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation
related expenses (including stock-based compensation expense)
and fees for professional services.
General and administrative expenses for the second quarter of
2007 increased $1 million, or 1 percent, compared to
the same period of 2006. Our facility related expenses increased
$2 million mainly due to our new and expanded facilities
and depreciation also increased $3 million mainly due to
our continued investments in information technology assets and
server equipment. These increases were offset by a decrease in
compensation expense of $3 million (including a
$16 million reduction in expense due to the reversal of
stock-based compensation expense related to Terry Semels
resignation as Chief Executive Officer of the Company during the
second quarter of 2007).
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 increased $28 million, or
11 percent, compared to the same period of 2006.
Compensation expense increased by $16 million (including a
$16 million reduction in expense due to the reversal of
stock-based compensation expense related to Terry Semels
resignation as Chief Executive Officer of the Company during the
second quarter of 2007). Additionally, our facility related
expenses increased $9 million mainly due to our new and
expanded facilities and depreciation increased $6 million
mainly due to our continued investments in information
technology assets and server equipment.
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues
were 8 percent (including 1 percent related to
stock-based compensation expense) and 8 percent (including
1 percent related to stock-based compensation expense) for
the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively. General and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were
9 percent (including 1 percent related to stock-based
compensation expense) and 8 percent (including
2 percent related to stock-based compensation expense) for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Amortization of Intangibles. We have
purchased, and expect to continue purchasing, assets
and/or
businesses, which may include the purchase of intangible assets.
Amortization of developed technology and acquired intellectual
property rights is included in the cost of revenues and not in
amortization of intangibles.
Amortization of intangibles was approximately $25 million
for the second quarter of 2007, compared to $34 million for
the same period of 2006. Amortization of intangibles was
approximately $52 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, compared to $65 million for the same
period of 2006. Amortization of intangibles was 1 percent
and 2 percent of revenues for the second quarters of 2007
and 2006, respectively. Amortization of intangibles was
2 percent of revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The year over year
decrease in amortization of intangibles was primarily the result
of more intangible assets being fully amortized as of
June 30, 2007 compared to June 30, 2006. As of
June 30, 2007, we had net intangible assets of
$393 million on our condensed consolidated balance sheet,
including acquired intellectual property rights and developed
technology which are amortized in cost of revenues.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net
was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
$
|
37,924
|
|
|
$
|
33,701
|
|
|
$
|
73,401
|
|
|
$
|
71,838
|
|
Investment losses, net
|
|
|
(4,106
|
)
|
|
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
|
(3,335
|
)
|
|
|
(2,843
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
(2,808
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
$
|
36,090
|
|
|
$
|
30,736
|
|
|
$
|
71,526
|
|
|
$
|
66,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net was $31 million for the second quarter of
2007, a decrease of $5 million compared to the same period
in 2006. Interest and investment income for the second quarter
of 2007 decreased mainly from lower
28
average invested balances, compared to the same period in 2006.
Average interest rates were approximately 4.3 percent in
the second quarter of 2007, compared to 3.9 percent in the
same period of 2006. This increase was offset by an increase in
foreign currency translation losses incurred during the second
quarter of 2007.
Other income, net was $66 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, a decrease of $5 million compared to
the same period in 2006. Interest and investment income for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased mainly from lower
average invested balances, compared to the same period in 2006.
Average interest rates were approximately 4.4 percent in
the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to
3.8 percent in the same period of 2006. This increase was
offset by an increase in our foreign currency losses incurred
during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Other income,
net may fluctuate in future periods due to realized gains and
losses on investments, impairments of investments, changes in
our average investment balances, and changes in interest and
foreign exchange rates.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate
for the second quarter of 2007 was 41 percent, compared to
46 percent for the same period in 2006. The effective tax
rate for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was
43 percent, compared to 45 percent for the same period
in 2006. These effective tax rates differ from the amounts
computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate
primarily due to state taxes, foreign losses for which no tax
benefit is provided, and non-deductible stock-based compensation
expense. The effective tax rates for both periods in 2007 were
lower than the rates for the same periods in 2006 primarily due
to a one-time benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2007
resulting from a reduction in nondeductible executive
compensation expense.
We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
(FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. See
Note 14 Income Taxes in the
condensed consolidated financial statements for additional
information.
Earnings in Equity Interests. Earnings
in equity interests for the second quarter of 2007 was
$32 million, compared to $22 million for the same
period of 2006. Earnings in equity interests for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 was $61 million (net of
$7 million related to tax expense on dividends received),
compared to $48 million (net of $6 million related to
tax expense on dividends received) for the same period of 2006.
Earnings in equity interests consists of our share of the net
income or loss of our equity investments in Yahoo! Japan and
Alibaba. See Note 4 Investments in Equity
Interests in the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
Minority Interests in Operations of Consolidated
Subsidiaries. Minority interests in
operations of consolidated subsidiaries represents the minority
holders percentage share of income or losses from the
subsidiaries in which we hold a majority, but less than
100 percent, ownership interest and consolidate the
subsidiaries results in our consolidated financial
statements. Minority interests in operations of consolidated
subsidiaries were less than $1 million for the second
quarters of 2007 and 2006. Minority interests in operations of
consolidated subsidiaries were $2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007, compared to less than
$1 million for the same period in 2006. Minority interests
recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 were related to our Yahoo! 7 joint venture arrangement
which was completed in the first quarter of 2006. See
Note 3 Acquisitions in the
condensed consolidated financial statements for additional
information.
Business
Segment Results
We manage our business geographically. Our primary areas of
measurement and decision-making are the United States and
International. Management relies on an internal management
reporting process that provides revenue and segment operating
income before depreciation, amortization and stock-based
compensation expense for making financial decisions and
allocating resources. Segment operating income before
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense,
includes income from operations before depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense. Management
believes that segment operating income before depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense is an
appropriate measure for evaluating the operational performance
of our segments. However, this measure should be considered in
addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior to, income
from operations or other measures of financial performance
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States (GAAP).
29
Summarized information by segment was as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Revenues by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,070,134
|
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,118,514
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,167,172
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,219,271
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
505,720
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
579,406
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
975,737
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
1,150,499
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,575,854
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,697,920
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,142,909
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,369,770
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Percent of total revenues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Segment operating income before
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
340,598
|
|
|
$
|
362,337
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
$
|
675,867
|
|
|
$
|
703,855
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
116,260
|
|
|
|
111,292
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
215,923
|
|
|
|
229,809
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income
before depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
|
456,858
|
|
|
|
473,629
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
891,790
|
|
|
|
933,664
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(127,548
|
)
|
|
|
(159,893
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
(252,627
|
)
|
|
|
(310,895
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(99,723
|
)
|
|
|
(128,779
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
(208,364
|
)
|
|
|
(268,785
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
229,587
|
|
|
$
|
184,957
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
$
|
430,799
|
|
|
$
|
353,984
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue is attributed to individual countries according to the
international online property that generated the revenue. No
single foreign country accounted for more than 10 percent
of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007 or 2006.
United States. United States revenues
for the second quarter of 2007 increased $48 million or
5 percent, as compared to the same period in 2006. United
States revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007
increased $52 million or 2 percent, as compared to the
same period in 2006. Our year over year increases in revenues
were a result of growth in advertising across the majority of
the Yahoo! Properties and in our fee-based services. Our
expanding user base which has been attracting more advertisers
has been contributing to our growth in our advertising revenues.
The growth in our fee-based services is due to the increase in
our paying users for both existing and new offerings.
International. International revenues
for the second quarter of 2007 increased $74 million, or
15 percent, compared to the same period in 2006.
International revenues for the six months ended June 30,
2007 increased $175 million, or 18 percent, compared
to the same period in 2006. Most of the international revenue
increase came from marketing services revenue for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007. The year over year growth
in international marketing services revenue can be attributed to
our increased penetration into existing markets, coupled with
continued growth of the global online advertising marketplace.
International revenues accounted for approximately
34 percent of total revenues in the second quarter of 2007,
compared to 32 percent in the same period in 2006.
International revenues accounted for approximately
34 percent of total revenues in the six months ended
June 30, 2007, compared to 31 percent in the same
period in 2006.
The strong performance of our international operations has
increased our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.
Revenues and related expenses generated by our international
subsidiaries are generally denominated in the currencies of the
local countries. Primary currencies include Euros, British
Pounds, Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Taiwan Dollars, Australian
Dollars, and Canadian Dollars. The statements of income of our
international operations are translated into United States
Dollars at the average exchange rates in each applicable period.
To the extent the United States Dollar strengthens against
foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency
denominated transactions results in reduced revenues, operating
expenses and net income for our International
30
segment. Similarly, our revenues, operating expenses and net
income will increase for our International segment if the United
States dollar weakens against foreign currencies. Using the
average foreign currency exchange rates for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006, our international revenues for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 would have
been lower than we reported by approximately $14 million
and $40 million, respectively.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP. The preparation of these condensed consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires
an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is
made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been
used, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably
likely to occur, could materially impact the condensed
consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following
critical accounting policies reflect the more significant
estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. Our revenues are
generated from marketing services and fees. Marketing services
revenue is generated from several offerings including: the
display of textual, rich media advertisements, display of text
based links to the advertisers websites, listing based
services, and commerce based transactions. Fees revenue includes
revenue from a variety of consumer and business fee-based
services. While the majority of our revenue transactions contain
standard business terms and conditions, there are certain
transactions that contain non-standard business terms and
conditions. In addition, we may enter into certain sales
transactions that involve multiple element arrangements
(arrangements with more than one deliverable). We also enter
into arrangements to purchase goods
and/or
services from certain customers. As a result, significant
contract interpretation is sometimes required to determine the
appropriate accounting for these transactions including:
(1) whether an arrangement exists; (2) how the
arrangement consideration should be allocated among potential
multiple elements; (3) when to recognize revenue on the
deliverables; (4) whether all elements of the arrangement
have been delivered; (5) whether the arrangements should be
reported gross as a principal versus net as an agent; and
(6) whether we receive a separately identifiable benefit
from purchase arrangements with our customers for which we can
reasonably estimate fair value. In addition, our revenue
recognition policy requires an assessment as to whether
collection is reasonably assured, which inherently requires us
to evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers. Changes in
judgments on these assumptions and estimates could materially
impact the timing or amount of revenue recognition.
Deferred Income Tax Asset Valuation
Allowance. We record a valuation allowance to
reduce our deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more
likely than not to be realized. In evaluating our ability to
recover our deferred income tax assets we consider all available
positive and negative evidence, including our operating results,
on-going tax planning and forecasts of future taxable income on
a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. In the event we were to
determine that we would be able to realize our deferred income
tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount,
we would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which
would reduce the provision for income taxes. Conversely, in the
event that all or part of the net deferred tax assets are
determined not to be realizable in the future, an adjustment to
the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the
period such determination is made.
We establish reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on
estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes
will be due. These reserves are established when we believe that
certain positions might be challenged despite our belief that
our tax return positions are supportable. Effective
January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FIN 48.
See Note 14 Income Taxes in the
condensed consolidated financial statements for additional
information.
31
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment at
the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below
an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual
tests in certain circumstances. Application of the goodwill
impairment test requires judgment, including the identification
of reporting units, assigning assets and liabilities to
reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units, and
determining the fair value of each reporting unit. Significant
judgments required to estimate the fair value of reporting units
include estimating future cash flows, and determining
appropriate discount rates, growth rates and other assumptions.
Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially
affect the determination of fair value for each reporting unit
which could trigger impairment. See Note 5
Goodwill in the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information. Based on our 2006
impairment test, there would have to be a significant
unfavorable change to our assumptions used in such calculations
for an impairment to exist.
We amortize other intangible assets over their estimated useful
lives. We record an impairment charge on these assets when we
determine that their carrying value may not be recoverable. The
carrying value is not recoverable if it exceeds the undiscounted
future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition. When there is existence of one or more
indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment of
intangible assets based on a projected discounted cash flow
method using a discount rate determined by our management to be
commensurate with the risk inherent in our business model. Our
estimates of future cash flows attributable to our other
intangible assets require significant judgment based on our
historical and anticipated results and are subject to many
factors. Different assumptions and judgments could materially
affect the calculation of the fair value of our other intangible
assets which could trigger impairment.
Investments in Equity Interests. We
account for investments in entities in which we can exercise
significant influence but do not own a majority equity interest
or otherwise control using the equity method. In accounting for
these investments we record our proportionate share of these
entities net income or loss, one quarter in arrears.
We review all of our investments in equity interests for
impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be
fully recoverable. The impairment review requires significant
judgment to identify events or circumstances that would likely
have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the
investment. Investments identified as having an indication of
impairment are subject to further analysis to determine if the
impairment is other-than-temporary and this analysis requires
estimating the fair value of the investment. The determination
of the fair value of the investment involves considering factors
such as the following: the stock prices of public companies in
which we have an equity investment, current economic and market
conditions, the operating performance of the companies including
current earnings trends and undiscounted cash flows, quoted
stock prices of comparable public companies, and other company
specific information including recent financing rounds. The fair
value determination, particularly for investments in
privately-held companies, requires significant judgment to
determine appropriate estimates and assumptions. Changes in
these estimates and assumptions could affect the calculation of
the fair value of the investments and the determination of
whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary.
Stock-Based Compensation
Expense. Effective January 1, 2006 we
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) and
under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, we
recognize stock-based compensation net of an estimated
forfeiture rate and therefore only recognize compensation cost
for those shares expected to vest over the service period of the
award.
Calculating stock-based compensation expense requires the input
of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected term of
the stock-based awards, stock price volatility, and the
pre-vesting option forfeiture rate. We estimate the expected
life of options granted based on historical exercise patterns,
which we believe are representative of future behavior. We
estimate the volatility of our common stock on the date of grant
based on the implied volatility of publicly traded options on
our common stock, with a term of one year or greater. We believe
that implied volatility calculated based on actively traded
options on our common stock is a better indicator of expected
volatility and future stock price trends than historical
volatility. Therefore, expected volatility for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was based on a
market-based implied volatility. The assumptions used in
calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent our
best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent
uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a
result, if factors change and we use
32
different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense
could be materially different in the future. In addition, we are
required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate, as well as
the probability that performance conditions that affect the
vesting of certain awards will be achieved, and only recognize
expense for those shares expected to vest. We estimate the
forfeiture rate based on historical experience of our
stock-based awards that are granted, exercised and cancelled. If
our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our
estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be
significantly different from what we have recorded in the
current period. See Note 10 Stock-Based
Compensation in the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes
guidelines for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures
regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not
require any new fair value measurements but eliminates
inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting
pronouncements. SFAS 157 will be effective for us on
January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS 157 but do not believe that the adoption of
SFAS 157 will have any material impact on our financial
position, cash flows, or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159) which permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159 will be
effective for us on January 1, 2008. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 159 but do not
believe that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have any
material impact on our financial position, cash flows, or
results of operations.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,569,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,812
|
|
Marketable debt securities
|
|
|
1,967,414
|
|
|
|
1,625,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents, and
marketable debt securities
|
|
$
|
3,537,285
|
|
|
$
|
3,151,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total assets
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Cash Flow Highlights
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
814,565
|
|
|
$
|
840,303
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
$
|
(175,457
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,093
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
$
|
(512,145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(928,673
|
)
|
Our operating activities for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 generated adequate cash to meet our operating
needs. As of June 30, 2007, we had cash, cash equivalents
and marketable debt securities totaling $3.2 billion,
compared to $3.5 billion at December 31, 2006. During
the six months ended June 30, 2007, we invested
$1,015 million in direct stock repurchases (of which
$2 million related to a restricted stock award net share
settlement) and a net $250 million in structured stock
repurchases. Additionally, we invested $263 million in net
capital expenditures and a net $36 million in acquisitions.
The cash used for these investments was offset by
$840 million cash generated from operating activities and
$204 million from the issuance of common stock as a result
of the exercise of stock options. The excess tax benefits from
stock-based awards of $134 million was reported as a
reduction of cash flows from operating activities and an
increase to cash flows from financing activities.
We expect to continue to generate positive cash flows from
operations for the remainder of 2007. We use cash generated by
operations as our primary source of liquidity, since we believe
that internally generated cash flows are
33
sufficient to support our business operations and capital
expenditures. We believe that existing cash, cash equivalents
and investments in marketable debt securities, together with any
cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet normal
operating requirements including capital expenditures for the
next twelve months. However, we may sell additional equity or
debt securities or obtain credit facilities to further enhance
our liquidity position, and the sale of additional equity
securities could result in dilution to our stockholders.
Cash
flow changes
Cash provided by operating activities is driven by our net
income, adjusted for non-cash items, and non-operating gains and
losses from sales of investments. Non-cash adjustments include
depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense,
tax benefits from stock-based awards, deferred income taxes, and
earnings in equity interests. Cash provided by operating
activities was greater than net income in the second quarter of
2007 mainly due to the net impact of non-cash adjustments to
income. In the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, operating cash flows were positively impacted by changes
in working capital balances.
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities was primarily
attributable to capital expenditures, purchases and sales of
marketable debt and equity securities, as well as acquisitions
including our strategic investments. In the six months ended
June 30, 2007, we invested $263 million in net capital
expenditures and a net $36 million in acquisitions, which
was offset by $352 million of cash generated from the net
sales and maturities of marketable debt securities. In the six
months ended June 30, 2006, we invested $317 million
in net capital expenditures, and a net $55 million in
acquisitions, which was offset by $197 million of cash
generated from the net sales and maturities of marketable debt
securities.
Cash used in financing activities is driven by our financing
activities relating to stock repurchases and employee option
exercises. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we
used $1,013 million in the direct purchase of
34.5 million shares of our common stock at an average price
of $29.39 per share. We also entered into a structured stock
repurchase transaction, which settles in cash or stock depending
on the market price of our common stock on the date of maturity,
resulting in a total cash outlay of $250 million. In
addition, certain restricted stock awards that vested during the
six months ended June 30, 2007 were net share settled. The
net share settlement had the effect of a stock repurchase of
$2 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we used
$690 million in the direct repurchase of 20.8 million
shares of our common stock at an average price of $33.16 per
share. During the six months ended June 30, 2006,
15.1 million shares were repurchased as a result of the
settlement of a $495 million structured stock transaction
we entered into in 2005. In the six months ended June 30,
2006, we entered into structured stock repurchase transactions
resulting in a total cash outlay of $500 million, which
were offset by cash proceeds of $272 million from the
settlement of a structured stock transaction resulting in a net
cash outlay of $228 million.
Additionally, we had cash proceeds from employee option
exercises of $204 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, compared to $190 million for the same
period in 2006. Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards
(which are included as a source of cash flows from financing
activities) were $134 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, compared to $216 million for the same
period in 2006.
Financing
In April 2003, we issued $750 million of zero coupon senior
convertible notes (the Notes) which are due
April 1, 2008. These Notes are convertible into Yahoo!
common stock at a conversion price of $20.50 per share, subject
to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. Each $1,000
principal amount of the Notes will be convertible prior to April
2008 if the market price of our common stock reaches a specified
threshold for a defined period of time or specified corporate
transactions occur. Upon conversion, we have the right to
deliver cash in lieu of common stock. As of June 30, 2007,
the market price condition for convertibility of the Notes was
satisfied with respect to the third quarter beginning
July 1, 2007 and ending September 30, 2007. We may be
required to repurchase all of the Notes following a fundamental
change of the Company, such as a change of control, prior to
maturity at face value. We may not redeem the Notes prior to
their maturity. See Note 9 Short-Term
Debt in the condensed consolidated financial statements
for additional information related to the Notes. To the extent
that holders of the Notes do not exercise their conversion
rights prior to the maturity date of April 1, 2008, we will
be
34
obligated to pay in cash the principal amount of any such Notes
that remain outstanding on such maturity date. Consequently, the
Notes have been classified as short-term debt in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007. The Notes
were misclassified as long-term debt in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 that was
included in the our second quarter earnings release issued on
July 17, 2007.
Stock
repurchases
In October 2006, following the completion of the
$3.0 billion share repurchase program that was authorized
in March 2005 and was to expire by its terms in March 2010, our
Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program for
us to repurchase up to $3.0 billion of our outstanding
shares of common stock from time to time over the next five
years, depending on market conditions, share price, and other
factors. Repurchases may take place in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions, including derivative
transactions, and may be made under a
Rule 10b5-1
plan.
As of June 30, 2007, there was an outstanding
$250 million structured stock repurchase transaction which
was entered into in the first quarter of 2007 and will mature in
the third quarter of 2007. On the maturity date, if the market
price of our common stock is above $33.00, we will have our
investment returned with a premium and if the market price of
our common stock is at or below such pre-determined price, we
will repurchase 8.4 million shares of our common stock, at
an effective buy-back price of $29.80 per share. This
outstanding transaction is recorded in stockholders equity
in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. See
Note 11 Stock Repurchase Programs
in the condensed consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
Subsequent to June 30, 2007, we repurchased approximately
4 million shares of our common stock at an average price of
$26.75 per share, for a total of $100 million.
Capital
expenditures
Capital expenditures have generally comprised purchases of
computer hardware, software, server equipment, furniture and
fixtures, and real estate. Capital expenditures, net were
$263 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007,
compared to $317 million in the same period in 2006.
Our capital expenditures in 2007 are expected to be consistent
with 2006 levels as we continue to invest in the expansion of
the Yahoo! Properties and our offerings. This level of
expenditure, together with the increase in operating lease
commitments, is consistent with our increased headcount and
operational expansion, and we anticipate that this will continue
in the future as business conditions merit.
Contractual
obligations and commitments
Operating Leases. We have entered into
various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for office
space and data centers globally for original lease periods up to
23 years, expiring between 2007 and 2027.
A summary of gross lease commitments as of June 30, 2007 is
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross lease
|
|
|
|
commitments
|
|
|
Six months ending
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
Years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
114
|
|
2009
|
|
|
113
|
|
2010
|
|
|
98
|
|
2011
|
|
|
78
|
|
2012
|
|
|
70
|
|
Due after 5 years
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross lease commitments
|
|
$
|
869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Affiliate Commitments. In connection
with our contracts to provide sponsored search
and/or
display advertising services to affiliates, we are obligated to
make payments, which represent traffic acquisition costs, to our
affiliates. As of June 30, 2007, these commitments totaled
$177 million, of which $10 million will be payable in
the remainder of 2007, $43 million will be payable in 2008,
$63 million will be payable in 2009, and $61 million
will be payable in 2010.
Intellectual Property Rights. In
connection with the licensing of certain intellectual property,
we are obligated to invest up to $184 million through July
2008. To the extent the licensed intellectual property will
benefit future periods, we will capitalize such payments and
amortize them over the useful life of the related intellectual
property.
Income Taxes. As of June 30, 2007,
the unrecognized tax benefits that resulted in an accrued
liability amounted to $236 million and are classified as
deferred and other long-term tax liabilities on our
condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2007,
the settlement period for our income tax liabilities cannot be
determined, however, the liabilities are not expected to become
due within the next twelve months.
Other Commitments. In the ordinary
course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying
scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business
partners and other parties with respect to certain matters,
including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach
of agreements, services to be provided by us, or from
intellectual property claims made by third parties. In addition,
we have entered into indemnification agreements with our
directors and certain of our officers that will require us,
among other things, to indemnify them against certain
liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service
as directors or officers. We have also agreed to indemnify
certain former officers, directors and employees of acquired
companies in connection with the acquisition of such companies.
We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover
certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our
directors and officers. It is not possible to determine the
maximum potential loss under these indemnification agreements
due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and
the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular
agreement. Such indemnification agreements may not be subject to
maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred
material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements
and we have not accrued any liabilities related to such
indemnification obligations in our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes, foreign
currency fluctuations, and changes in the market values of our
investments.
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to
market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily
to our investment portfolio. We invest excess cash in marketable
debt instruments of the United States Government and its
agencies, and in high-quality corporate issuers and, by policy,
limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. We
protect and preserve invested funds by limiting default, market
and reinvestment risk.
Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest
earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed
rate securities may have their fair market value adversely
impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate
securities may produce less income than expected if interest
rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment
income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest
rates or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell
securities which have declined in market value due to changes in
interest rates. As of June 30, 2007 and 2006, we had
investments in short-term marketable debt securities of
approximately $0.9 billion and $1.1 billion,
respectively. Such investments had a weighted-average yield of
approximately 4.6 percent and 3.8 percent,
respectively. As of June 30, 2007 and 2006, we had
investments in long-term marketable debt securities of
approximately $0.8 billion and $1.3 billion,
respectively. Such investments had a weighted average yield of
approximately 4.9 percent and 4.3 percent,
respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in
interest rates would result in an approximate $15 million
and $25 million decrease (approximately 1 percent),
respectively, in the fair value of our available-for-sale debt
securities as of June 30, 2007 and 2006.
The fair market value of the zero coupon senior convertible
notes (the Notes) issued by Yahoo! and due in April
2008 is subject to interest rate risk and market risk due to the
convertible feature of the Notes. Generally, the
36
fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as
interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The
fair market value of the Notes will also increase as the market
price of the Yahoo! stock increases and decrease as the market
price falls. The interest and market value changes affect the
fair market value of the Notes but do not impact our financial
position, cash flows or results of operations. As of
June 30, 2007 and 2006, the fair value of the Notes were
approximately $1 billion and $1.2 billion,
respectively, based on quoted market prices.
Foreign Currency Risk. International
revenues accounted for approximately 34 percent of total
revenues for both the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, compared to 32 percent and 31 percent of total
revenues in the same periods in 2006. International revenues in
the second quarter of 2007 increased $74 million, or
15 percent, compared to the same period in 2006.
International revenues in the six months ended June 30,
2007 increased $175 million, or 18 percent, compared
to the same period in 2006. The growth in our international
operations has increased our exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations. Revenues and related expenses generated from our
international subsidiaries are generally denominated in the
currencies of the local countries. Primary currencies include
Euros, British Pounds, Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Taiwan Dollars,
Australian Dollars, and Canadian Dollars. The statements of
income of our international operations are translated into
United States Dollars at the average exchange rates in each
applicable period. To the extent the United States Dollar
strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of these
foreign currency denominated transactions results in reduced
revenues, operating expenses and net income for our
International segment. Similarly, our revenues, operating
expenses and net income will increase for our International
segment, if the United States Dollar weakens against foreign
currencies. Using the average foreign currency exchange rates
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, our
international revenues for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007 would have been lower than we reported by
approximately $14 million and $40 million,
respectively.
We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as we
convert the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries and
our investments in equity interests into United States dollars
in consolidation. If there is a change in foreign currency
exchange rates, the conversion of the foreign subsidiaries
financial statements into United States dollars will lead to a
translation gain or loss which is recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income which is part of
stockholders equity. In addition, we have certain assets
and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than
the relevant entitys functional currency. Changes in the
functional currency value of these assets and liabilities create
fluctuations that will lead to a transaction gain or loss. In
the second quarter of 2007, our net foreign currency transaction
losses, realized and unrealized, was $0.1 million, compared
to net gains of $3 million in the same period in 2006. In
the six months ended June 30, 2007, our net foreign
currency transaction losses, realized and unrealized, was
$2 million, compared to net gains of $3 million in the
same period in 2006. Net foreign currency transaction gains or
losses were recorded in other income, net on the condensed
consolidated statements of income.
Investment Risk. The primary objective
of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at
the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing
risk. To achieve this objective, we maintain our portfolio of
cash equivalents and current and long-term investments in a
variety of securities, including both government and corporate
obligations and money market funds. As of June 30, 2007 and
2006, net unrealized losses on these investments were not
material.
We are exposed to market risk as it relates to changes in the
market value of our investments. We invest in equity instruments
of public companies for business and strategic purposes and have
classified these securities as available-for-sale. These
available-for-sale equity investments are subject to significant
fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the stock
market and the industries in which these companies participate.
We have realized gains and losses from the sale of investments,
as well as impairment charges on some of our investments. Our
investments in available-for-sale equity securities were not
material as of June 30, 2007 and 2006. Our objective in
managing exposure to stock market fluctuations is to minimize
the impact of stock market declines to earnings and cash flows.
Using a hypothetical reduction of 10 percent in the stock
price of these equity securities, the fair value of our equity
investments would decrease by approximately $10 million and
$10 million as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
37
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The
Companys management, with the participation of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. There have not been any changes in
the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as
such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
38
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
From time to time, third parties assert patent infringement
claims against Yahoo!. Currently, we are engaged in several
lawsuits regarding patent issues and have been notified of a
number of other potential patent disputes. In addition, from
time to time we are subject to other legal proceedings and
claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of
alleged infringement of trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets
and other intellectual property rights, claims related to
employment matters, and a variety of other claims, including
claims alleging defamation, invasion of privacy, or similar
claims arising in connection with our
e-mail,
message boards, auction sites, shopping services and other
communications and community features.
On May 24, 2001, Arista Records, Inc., Bad Boy Records, BMG
Music d/b/a The RCA Records Label, Capitol Records, Inc., Virgin
Records America, Inc., Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., UMG
Recordings, Inc., Interscope Records, Motown Record Company,
L.P., and Zomba Recording Corporation filed a lawsuit alleging
copyright infringement against LAUNCH Media, Inc.
(LAUNCH) in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs alleged, among
other things, that the consumer-influenced portion of
LAUNCHs LAUNCHcast service is interactive
within the meaning of Section 114 of the Copyright Act and
therefore does not qualify for the compulsory license provided
for by the Copyright Act. The Complaint sought declaratory and
injunctive relief and damages for the alleged infringement.
After the lawsuit was commenced, Yahoo! entered into an
agreement to acquire LAUNCH, which closed in August 2001, and
since that time LAUNCH has been a wholly owned subsidiary of
Yahoo!. Because LAUNCH settled the LAUNCH litigation as to all
other plaintiffs, BMG Music d/b/a/The RCA Records Label was the
sole remaining plaintiff in this proceeding. On April 27,
2007, after a two week jury trial, the jury returned a unanimous
verdict in favor of LAUNCH finding no liability. The plaintiff
has filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit.
On July 12, 2001, the first of several purported securities
class action lawsuits was filed in the United States District
Court, Southern District of New York against certain
underwriters involved in Overture Services Inc.s
(Overture) initial public offering, Overture, and
certain of Overtures current and former officers and
directors. The Court consolidated the cases against Overture.
Plaintiffs allege, among other things, violations of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
involving undisclosed compensation to the underwriters, and
improper practices by the underwriters, and seek unspecified
damages. Similar complaints were filed in the same court against
numerous public companies that conducted initial public
offerings of their common stock since the mid-1990s. All of
these lawsuits were consolidated for pretrial purposes before
Judge Shira Scheindlin. On April 19, 2002, plaintiffs filed
an amended complaint, alleging
Rule 10b-5
claims of fraud. On July 15, 2002, the issuers filed an
omnibus motion to dismiss for failure to comply with applicable
pleading standards. On October 8, 2002, the Court entered
an Order of Dismissal as to all of the individual defendants in
the Overture IPO litigation, without prejudice. On
February 19, 2003, the Court denied the motion to dismiss
the
Rule 10b-5
claims against certain defendants, including Overture. Overture
accepted a proposal for the settlement and release of claims
against the issuer defendants, including Overture. The
settlement was presented to the Court in June 2004. On
February 15, 2005, the Court issued an order granting
conditional preliminary approval of the settlement proposal. On
August 31, 2005, the Court issued an order confirming
preliminary approval of the settlement. On April 24, 2006,
the Court held a fairness hearing in connection with the motion
for final approval of the settlement. The Court has yet to issue
a ruling on the motion for final approval. The settlement
remains subject to a number of conditions, including final
approval of the Court. On December 5, 2006, the Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the Courts October
2004 order certifying a class in six test cases that were
selected by the underwriter defendants and plaintiffs in the
coordinated proceeding and on April 6, 2007 denied a
petition for rehearing of its order. Overture is not one of the
test cases and it is unclear what impact this will have on the
class in Overtures case. If the settlement does not occur,
and litigation against Overture continues, we intend to defend
the case vigorously.
On May 11, 2007, the first of two purported securities
class action lawsuits was filed against Yahoo! Inc. and certain
of its officers and members of the Board of Directors. The first
lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, Central
District of California by plaintiff Ellen Rosenthal Brodsky and
the second lawsuit was filed in the United States District
Court, Central District of California by plaintiff Manfred
Hacker. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, violation of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 sections 10(b) and
20(a), as well as
Rule 10b-5.
The
39
plaintiffs generally claim that Yahoo! issued false, deceptive
or misleading statements concerning its advertising business,
financial results, and sales and growth potential between
April 8, 2004 and July 18, 2006. The complaints seek
unspecified compensatory damages, injunctive relief, costs and
attorneys fees. We believe these cases are without merit
and intend to defend them vigorously.
On May 15, 2007, the first of two shareholder derivative
actions was filed in the Superior Court of Santa Clara
County by plaintiff Greg Brockwell against certain officers and
members of the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Inc.
purportedly on behalf of Yahoo! Inc. The second derivative
action was filed in the United States District Court for the
Central District of California on June 14, 2007 by
plaintiff Jill Watkins. The derivative actions, which include
allegations of substantially identical facts to the purported
securities class actions, attempt to state various claims under
California law for trading by defendants on alleged material
non-public information, and allegations of breaches of fiduciary
duties relating to financial reporting, misappropriation of
information, abuse of control and waste of corporate assets. The
federal derivative action includes an additional claim for
alleged violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. The derivative actions seek unspecified
damages, equitable and injunctive relief, including, among other
things, changes to corporate governance and internal procedures,
restitution and disgorgement of profits and compensation
received by defendants, costs and attorneys fees.
We do not believe, based on current knowledge, that any of the
foregoing legal proceedings or claims are likely to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. However, we may incur substantial
expenses in defending against such claims. In the event of a
determination adverse to Yahoo! or its subsidiaries, we may
incur substantial monetary liability, and be required to change
our business practices. Either of these could have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
We have updated the risk factors previously disclosed in
Part II Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, which was filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2007, as
set forth below. We do not believe any of the changes constitute
material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in
the 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
We
face significant competition from large-scale Internet content,
product and service aggregators, principally Google, Microsoft
and AOL.
We face significant competition from companies, principally
Google, Microsoft and AOL, that have aggregated a variety of
Internet products, services and content in a manner similar to
Yahoo!. Googles Internet search service directly competes
with us for affiliate and advertiser arrangements, both of which
are key to our business and operating results. Additionally,
Google offers many other services that directly compete with our
services, including a consumer
e-mail
service, desktop search, local search, instant messaging,
photos, maps, mobile applications, shopping services and
advertising solutions. Microsoft has introduced its own Internet
search service with paid search and may release features that
may make Internet searching capabilities a more integrated part
of its Windows operating system. AOL has access to content from
Time Warners movie, television, music, book, periodical,
news, sports and other media holdings; access to a network of
cable and other broadband users and delivery technologies; and
considerable resources for future growth and expansion. Some of
the existing competitors and possible additional entrants may
have greater operational, strategic, financial, personnel or
other resources than we do, as well as greater brand recognition
either overall or for certain products and services. We expect
these competitors increasingly to use their financial and
engineering resources to compete with us, individually, and
potentially in combination with each other. In certain of these
cases, most notably AOL, our competition has a direct billing
relationship with a greater number of their users through
Internet access and other services than we have with our users
through our premium services. This relationship may permit such
competitors to be more effective than us in targeting services
and advertisements to the specific preferences of their users
thereby giving them a competitive advantage. If our competitors
are more successful than we are in developing compelling
products or attracting and retaining users or advertisers, then
our revenues and growth rates could decline.
40
We
also face competition from other Internet service companies,
including Internet access providers, device manufacturers
offering online services and destination websites.
Our users must access our services through Internet access
providers, including wireless providers and providers of cable
and broadband Internet access. To the extent that an access
provider or device manufacturer offers online services
competitive with those of Yahoo!, the user may elect to use the
services or properties of that access provider or manufacturer.
In addition, the access provider or manufacturer may make it
difficult to access our services by not listing them in the
access providers or manufacturers own directory or
by providing Yahoo! with less prominent listings than the access
provider, manufacturer, or a competitors offerings. Such
access providers and manufacturers may prove better able to
target services and advertisements to the preferences of their
users. If such access providers and device manufacturers are
more successful than we are in developing compelling products or
attracting and retaining customers, users or advertisers, then
our revenues could decline. Further, to the extent that Internet
access providers, mobile service providers or network providers
increase the costs of service to users or restrict Yahoo!s
ability to deliver products, services and content to end users
or increase our costs of doing so, our revenues could decline.
We also compete for customers, users and advertisers with many
other providers of online services, including destination
websites and social media and networking sites. Some of these
competitors may have more expertise in a particular segment of
the market, and within such segment, have longer operating
histories, larger advertiser or user bases, and more brand
recognition or technological features than we offer.
In the future, competitors may acquire additional competitive
offerings, and if we are unable to complete strategic
acquisitions or investments, our business could become less
competitive. Further, competitors may consolidate with each
other to become more competitive, and new competitors may enter
the market. If our competitors are more successful than we are
in developing compelling products or attracting and retaining
users, advertisers or customers, then our revenues and growth
rates could decline.
We
face significant competition from traditional media companies
which could adversely affect our future operating
results.
We also compete with traditional media companies for
advertising. Most advertisers currently spend only a small
portion of their advertising budgets on Internet advertising. If
we fail to persuade existing advertisers to retain and increase
their spending with us and if we fail to persuade new
advertisers to spend a portion of their budget on advertising
with us, our revenues could decline and our future operating
results could be adversely affected.
If we
are unable to provide search technologies and other services
which generate significant traffic to our websites, or we are
unable to enter into or continue distribution relationships that
drive significant traffic to our websites, our business could be
harmed, causing our revenues to decline.
We have deployed our own Internet search technology to provide
search results on our network. We have more limited experience
in operating our own search service than do some of our
competitors. Internet search is characterized by rapidly
changing technology, significant competition, evolving industry
standards and frequent product and service enhancements. We must
continually invest in improving our users experience,
including search relevance, speed and services responsive to
their needs and preferences, to continue to attract, retain and
expand our user base. If we are unable to provide search
technologies and other services which generate significant
traffic to our websites, or if we are unable to enter into
distribution relationships that continue to drive significant
traffic to our websites, our business could be harmed, causing
our revenues to decline.
The
majority of our revenues are derived from marketing services,
and the reduction in spending by or loss of current or potential
advertisers would cause our revenues and operating results to
decline.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, 88 percent of our
total revenues came from marketing services. Our ability to
continue to retain and grow marketing services revenue depends
upon:
|
|
|
|
|
maintaining our user base;
|
|
|
|
maintaining our popularity as an Internet destination site;
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
broadening our relationships with advertisers to small- and
medium- sized businesses;
|
|
|
|
attracting advertisers to our user base;
|
|
|
|
increasing demand for our marketing services by advertisers,
users, businesses and affiliates, including prices paid by
advertisers, the number of searches performed by users, the rate
at which users click-through to commercial search results and
advertiser perception of the quality of leads generated by our
marketing services;
|
|
|
|
the successful implementation, and acceptance by advertisers and
affiliates, of our systems improvements to increase monetization
of our search marketing;
|
|
|
|
the successful development and deployment of technology
improvements to our marketing system;
|
|
|
|
maintaining our affiliate program for our search marketing;
|
|
|
|
deriving better demographic and other information from our
users; and
|
|
|
|
driving acceptance of the web in general and of Yahoo! in
particular by advertisers as an advertising medium.
|
In many cases, our agreements with advertisers have terms of one
year or less, or, in the case of search marketing, may be
terminated at any time by the advertiser. Search marketing
agreements often have payments dependent upon usage or
click-through levels. Accordingly, it is difficult to forecast
marketing services revenues accurately. However, our expense
levels are based in part on expectations of future revenues,
including occasional guaranteed minimum payments to our
affiliates in connection with search
and/or
display advertising, and are fixed over the short-term with
respect to certain categories. Any reduction in spending by or
loss of existing or potential future advertisers would cause our
revenues to decline. Further, we may be unable to adjust
spending quickly enough to compensate for any unexpected revenue
shortfall.
In
certain markets, we depend on a limited number of sources to
direct a significant percentage of users and businesses to our
service to conduct searches, and a loss of any of these sources
could harm our operating results.
A significant percentage of users and businesses that conduct
searches and access our search marketing listings comes from a
limited number of sources in certain markets. In addition to the
Yahoo! Properties, sources for users are members of our
affiliate network, including portals, browsers and other
affiliates. Our agreements with affiliates vary in duration, and
depending on the agreement, provide varying levels of discretion
to the affiliate in the implementation of search marketing,
including the degree to which affiliates can modify the
presentation of the search marketing listings on their websites
or integrate search marketing with their own services. The
agreements may be terminable upon the occurrence of certain
events, including failure to meet certain service levels,
material breaches of agreement terms, changes in control or in
some instances, at will. We may not be successful in renewing
our affiliate agreements on as favorable terms or at all. The
loss of affiliates providing significant users or businesses or
an adverse change in implementation of search marketing by any
of these affiliates could harm our ability to generate revenue,
our operating results and cash flows from operations.
We may
not be able to generate substantial revenues from our alliances
with Internet access providers.
Through alliances with Internet access providers, we offer
access services that combine customized content and services
from Yahoo! (including browser and other communications
services) and Internet access from third party access providers.
We may not be able to retain the alliances with our existing
Internet access providers or to obtain new alliances with
Internet access providers on terms that are reasonable. In
addition, these Internet access services compete with many large
companies such as AOL, Microsoft, Comcast Corporation and other
established Internet access providers. In certain of these
cases, our competition has substantially greater market presence
(including an existing user base) and greater financial,
technical, marketing or other resources. As a result of these
and other competitive factors, the Internet access providers
with which we have formed alliances may not be able to attract,
grow or retain their customer bases, which would negatively
impact our ability to sell customized content and services
through this channel and, in turn, reduce our anticipated
revenues from our alliances.
42
Some
of our shared revenue arrangements may not generate anticipated
revenues.
We typically receive co-branded revenue through revenue sharing
arrangements or a portion of transactions revenue. In some
cases, our revenue arrangements require that minimum levels of
user impressions be provided by us. These arrangements expose us
to potentially significant financial risks in the event our
usage levels decrease, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the revenue we are entitled to receive may be adjusted downwards;
|
|
|
|
we may be required to make good on our obligations
by providing additional advertising or alternative services;
|
|
|
|
the partners of co-brand services may not renew the arrangements
or may renew at lower rates; and
|
|
|
|
the arrangements may not generate anticipated levels of shared
transactions revenue, or partners may default on the payment
commitments in such agreements as has occurred in the past.
|
Accordingly, any leveling off or decrease of our user base (or
usage by our existing base) or the failure to generate
anticipated levels of shared transactions revenue could result
in a significant decrease in our revenues.
Decreases
or delays in advertising spending by our advertisers due to
general economic conditions could harm our ability to generate
advertising revenue.
Expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical, reflecting
overall economic conditions and budgeting and buying patterns.
Since we derive most of our revenues from advertising, any
decreases in or delays in advertising spending due to general
economic conditions could reduce our revenues or negatively
impact our ability to grow our revenues.
Financial
results for any particular period do not predict results for
future periods.
There can be no assurance that the purchasing pattern of
advertisers on the Yahoo! Properties will not fluctuate, that
advertisers will not make smaller and shorter-term purchases, or
that market prices for online advertising will not decrease due
to competitive or other factors. In addition, there can be no
assurance that the volume of searches conducted, the amounts bid
by advertisers for search marketing listings or the number of
advertisers that bid in our search marketing marketplace will
not vary widely from period to period. As revenues from new
sources increase, it may become more difficult to predict our
financial results based on historical performance. You should
not rely on the results for any period as an indication of
future performance.
We
estimate tax liabilities, the final determination of which is
subject to review by domestic and international taxation
authorities.
We are subject to income taxes and other taxes in both the
United States and the foreign jurisdictions in which we
currently operate or have historically operated. We are also
subject to review and audit by both domestic and foreign
taxation authorities. The determination of our worldwide
provision for income taxes and current and deferred tax assets
and liabilities requires judgment and estimation. In the
ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and
calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.
Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the
ultimate tax outcome may materially differ from the tax amounts
recorded in our consolidated financial statements and may
materially affect our income tax provision, net income or cash
flows in the period or periods for which such determination is
made.
We
rely on the value of our brands, and a failure to maintain or
enhance the Yahoo! brands in a cost-effective manner could harm
our operating results.
We believe that maintaining and enhancing our brands, including
those that contain the Yahoo! name as well as those that do not,
is an important aspect of our efforts to attract and expand our
user and advertiser base. We also believe that the importance of
brand recognition will increase due to the relatively low
barriers to entry in the Internet market. We have spent
considerable money and resources to date on the establishment
and maintenance of our brands, and we anticipate spending
increasing amounts of money on, and devoting greater resources
to,
43
advertising, marketing and other brand-building efforts to
preserve and enhance consumer awareness of our brands. We may
not be able to successfully maintain or enhance consumer
awareness of our brands and, even if we are successful in our
branding efforts, these efforts may not be cost-effective. If we
are unable to maintain or enhance customer awareness of our
brands in a cost-effective manner, our business, operating
results and financial condition could be harmed.
If we
are unable to license or acquire compelling content at
reasonable costs or if we do not develop or commission
compelling content of our own, the number of users of our
services may not grow as anticipated, or may decline, or
users level of engagement with our services may decline,
all or any of which could harm our operating
results.
Our future success depends in part upon our ability to aggregate
compelling content and deliver that content through our online
properties. We license much of the content on our online
properties, such as news items, stock quotes, weather reports,
maps and audio and video content from third parties. We have
been providing increasing amounts of audio and video content to
our users, and we believe that users will increasingly demand
high-quality audio and video content, such as music, film,
speeches, news footage, concerts and other special events. Such
content may require us to make substantial payments to third
parties from whom we license or acquire such content. For
example, our music and entertainment properties rely on major
sports organizations, radio and television stations, record
labels, music publishers, cable networks, businesses, colleges
and universities, film producers and distributors, and other
organizations for a large portion of the content available on
our properties. Our ability to maintain and build relationships
with third-party content providers will be critical to our
success. In addition, as new methods for accessing the Internet
become available, including through alternative devices, we may
need to enter into amended content agreements with existing
third-party content providers to cover the new devices. Also, to
the extent that Yahoo! develops content of its own,
Yahoo!s current and potential third-party content
providers may view our services as competitive with their own,
and this may adversely affect their willingness to contract with
us. We may be unable to enter into new, or preserve existing,
relationships with the third parties whose content we seek to
obtain. In addition, as competition for compelling content
increases both domestically and internationally, our content
providers may increase the prices at which they offer their
content to us, and potential content providers may not offer
their content to us or offer it on terms agreeable to us. An
increase in the prices charged to us by third-party content
providers could harm our operating results and financial
condition. Further, many of our content licenses with third
parties are non-exclusive. Accordingly, other webcasters and
other media such as radio or television may be able to offer
similar or identical content. This increases the importance of
our ability to deliver compelling editorial content and
personalization of this content for users in order to
differentiate Yahoo! from other businesses. If we are unable to
license or acquire compelling content at reasonable prices, if
other companies broadcast content that is similar to or the same
as that provided by Yahoo!, or if we do not develop compelling
editorial content or personalization services, the number of
users of our services may not grow as anticipated, or may
decline, which could harm our operating results.
Our
intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to
protect them could reduce the value of our brand image and harm
our business and our operating results.
We create, own and maintain a wide array of intellectual
property assets, including copyrights, patents, trademarks,
trade dress, trade secrets and rights to certain domain names,
which we believe are among our most valuable assets. We seek to
protect our intellectual property assets through patent,
copyright, trade secret, trademark and other laws of the United
States and other countries of the world, and through contractual
provisions. The efforts we have taken to protect our
intellectual property and proprietary rights may not be
sufficient or effective at stopping unauthorized use of those
rights. In addition, effective trademark, patent, copyright and
trade secret protection may not be available or cost-effective
in every country in which our products and media properties are
distributed or made available through the Internet. There may be
instances where we are not able to fully protect or utilize our
intellectual property assets in a manner to maximize competitive
advantages. Further, while we attempt to ensure that the quality
of our brand is maintained by our licensees, our licensees may
take actions that could impair the value of our brand, our
proprietary rights or the reputation of our products and media
properties. We are aware that third parties have, from time to
time, copied significant content available on Yahoo! for use in
competitive Internet services. Protection of the distinctive
elements of Yahoo! may not be available under copyright
44
law or trademark law. If we are unable to protect our
proprietary rights from unauthorized use, the value of our brand
image may be reduced. Any impairment of our brand could
negatively impact our business. In addition, protecting our
intellectual property and other proprietary rights is expensive
and time consuming. Any increase in the unauthorized use of our
intellectual property could make it more expensive to do
business and consequently harm our operating results.
We
are, and may in the future be, subject to intellectual property
infringement claims, which are costly to defend, could result in
significant damage awards, and could limit our ability to
provide certain content or use certain technologies in the
future.
Internet, technology, media companies and patent holding
companies often possess a significant number of patents.
Further, many of these companies and other parties are actively
developing or purchasing search, indexing, electronic commerce
and other Internet-related technologies, as well as a variety of
online business models and methods. We believe that these
parties will continue to take steps to protect these
technologies, including, but not limited to, seeking patent
protection. As a result, disputes regarding the ownership of
technologies and rights associated with online business are
likely to continue to arise in the future. From time to time,
parties assert patent infringement claims against us. Currently,
we are engaged in several lawsuits regarding patent issues and
have been notified of a number of other potential disputes.
In addition to patent claims, third parties have asserted, and
are likely in the future to assert, claims against us alleging
infringement of copyrights, trademark rights, trade secret
rights or other proprietary rights, or alleging unfair
competition or violations of privacy rights or failure to
maintain confidentiality of user data. In addition, third
parties have made, and may continue to make, trademark
infringement and related claims against us over the display of
search results triggered by search terms that include trademark
terms.
As we expand our business and develop new technologies, products
and services, we may become increasingly subject to intellectual
property infringement claims. In the event that there is a
determination that we have infringed third-party proprietary
rights such as patents, copyrights, trademark rights, trade
secret rights or other third party rights such as publicity and
privacy rights, we could incur substantial monetary liability,
be required to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements
or be prevented from using the rights, which could require us to
change our business practices in the future and limit our
ability to compete effectively. We may also incur substantial
expenses in defending against third-party infringement claims
regardless of the merit of such claims. In addition, many of our
agreements with our customers or affiliates require us to
indemnify them for certain third-party intellectual property
infringement claims, which could increase our costs in defending
such claims and our damages. The occurrence of any of these
results could harm our brand and negatively impact our operating
results.
We are
subject to United States and foreign government regulation of
Internet, mobile, and Voice over Internet Protocol services
which could subject us to claims and remedies including monetary
liabilities and limitations on our business
practices.
We are subject to regulations and laws directly applicable to
providers of Internet, mobile, and Voice over Internet Protocol
services both domestically and internationally. The application
of existing domestic and international laws and regulations to
Yahoo! relating to issues such as user privacy and data
protection, defamation, pricing, advertising, taxation,
gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, billing, real estate,
consumer protection, content regulation, quality of services,
telecommunications, mobile and intellectual property ownership
and infringement in many instances is unclear or unsettled. In
addition, we will also be subject to any new laws and
regulations directly applicable to our domestic and
international activities. Further, the application of existing
laws to Yahoo! or our subsidiaries regulating or requiring
licenses for certain businesses of our advertisers including,
for example, distribution of pharmaceuticals, alcohol, adult
content, tobacco or firearms, as well as insurance and
securities brokerage and legal services, can be unclear.
Internationally, we may also be subject to laws regulating our
activities in foreign countries and to foreign laws and
regulations that are inconsistent from country to country.
Recently, plaintiffs have attempted to use United States
statutes to recover damages against corporations, including
Yahoo!, for alleged human rights abuses committed by foreign
governments. We may incur substantial liabilities for expenses
necessary to defend such litigation, comply with these laws and
regulations or penalties for any failure to
45
comply. Compliance with these laws and regulations may also
cause us to change or limit our business practices in a manner
adverse to our business.
A number of United States federal laws, including those
referenced below, impact our business. The Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (DMCA) is intended, in part, to limit
the liability of eligible online service providers for listing
or linking to third-party websites that include materials that
infringe copyrights or other rights of others. Portions of the
Communications Decency Act (CDA) are intended to
provide statutory protections to online service providers who
distribute third party content. Yahoo! relies on the protections
provided by both the DMCA and CDA in conducting its business.
Any changes in these laws or judicial interpretations narrowing
their protections will subject us to greater risk of liability
and may increase our costs of compliance with these regulations
or limit our ability to operate certain lines of business. The
Childrens Online Protection Act and the Childrens
Online Privacy Protection Act are intended to restrict the
distribution of certain materials deemed harmful to children and
impose additional restrictions on the ability of online services
to collect user information from minors. In addition, the
Protection of Children From Sexual Predators Act of 1998
requires online service providers to report evidence of
violations of federal child pornography laws under certain
circumstances. The costs of compliance with these regulations
may increase in the future as a result of changes in the
regulations or the interpretation of them. Further, any failures
on our part to comply with these regulations may subject us to
significant liabilities.
Changes
in regulations or user concerns regarding privacy and protection
of user data could adversely affect our business.
Federal, state, foreign and international laws and regulations
may govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security
of data that we receive from our users and partners. In
addition, we have and post on our website our own privacy
policies and practices concerning the collection, use and
disclosure of user data. Any failure, or perceived failure, by
us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any
data-related consent orders, Federal Trade Commission
requirements or orders or other federal, state or international
privacy or consumer protection-related laws and regulations
could result in proceedings or actions against us by
governmental entities or others, which could potentially have an
adverse effect on our business.
Further, failure or perceived failure to comply with our
policies or applicable requirements related to the collection,
use, sharing or security of personal information or other
privacy-related matters could result in a loss of user
confidence in us, damage to the Yahoo! brands, and ultimately in
a loss of users, partners or advertisers, which could adversely
affect our business.
A large number of legislative proposals pending before the
United States Congress, various state legislative bodies and
foreign governments concern data privacy and retention issues
related to our business. It is not possible to predict whether
or when such legislation may be adopted. Certain proposals, if
adopted, could impose requirements that may result in a decrease
in our user registrations and revenues. In addition, the
interpretation and application of user data protection laws are
in a state of flux. These laws may be interpreted and applied
inconsistently from country to country and inconsistently with
our current data protection policies and practices. Complying
with these varying international requirements could cause us to
incur substantial costs or require us to change our business
practices in a manner adverse to our business.
Acquisitions
and strategic investments could result in adverse impacts on our
operations and in unanticipated liabilities.
We have acquired, and have made strategic investments in, a
number of companies (including through joint ventures) in the
past and expect to make additional acquisitions and strategic
investments in the future. Such transactions may result in
dilutive issuances of equity securities, use of our cash
resources, incurrence of debt and amortization expenses related
to intangible assets. Our acquisitions and strategic investments
to date were accompanied by a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of
our acquired companies into our operations;
|
|
|
|
the potential disruption of our on-going business and
distraction of management;
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
additional operating losses and expenses of the businesses we
acquired or in which we invested;
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of integrating acquired technology and rights
into our services and unanticipated expenses related to such
integration;
|
|
|
|
the failure to successfully further develop acquired technology
resulting in the impairment of amounts currently capitalized as
intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
the failure of strategic investments to perform as expected;
|
|
|
|
the potential for patent and trademark infringement claims
against the acquired company;
|
|
|
|
the impairment of relationships with customers and partners of
the companies we acquired or in which we invested or our
customers and partners as a result of the integration of
acquired operations;
|
|
|
|
the impairment of relationships with employees of the acquired
companies or our employees as a result of integration of new
management personnel;
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of integrating the acquired companys
accounting, management information, human resources and other
administrative systems;
|
|
|
|
our lack of, or limitations on, our control over the operations
of our joint venture companies;
|
|
|
|
in the case of foreign acquisitions, uncertainty regarding
foreign laws and regulations and difficulty integrating
operations and systems as a result of cultural, systems and
operational differences; and
|
|
|
|
the impact of known potential liabilities or unknown liabilities
associated with the companies we acquired or in which we
invested.
|
We are likely to experience similar risks in connection with our
future acquisitions and strategic investments. Our failure to be
successful in addressing these risks or other problems
encountered in connection with our past or future acquisitions
and strategic investments could cause us to fail to realize the
anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur
unanticipated liabilities and harm our business generally.
Our
failure to manage growth, diversification and changes to our
business could harm us.
We are continuing to grow, diversify and evolve our business
both in the United States and internationally. As a result of
the diversification of our business, personnel growth,
acquisitions and international expansion in the recent years,
more than one-half of our employees are now based outside of our
Sunnyvale, California headquarters. If we are unable to
effectively manage a large and geographically dispersed group of
employees or to anticipate our future growth and personnel
needs, our business may be adversely affected.
As we grow and diversify our business, we must also expand and
adapt our operational infrastructure. Our business relies on our
data systems, billing systems for our fee-based services, and
other operational and financial reporting and control systems.
All of these systems have become increasingly complex in the
recent past due to the growing diversification and complexity of
our business, to acquisitions of new businesses with different
systems and to increased regulation over controls and
procedures. To effectively manage our technical support
infrastructure, we will need to continue to upgrade and improve
our data systems, billing systems, and other operational and
financial systems, procedures and controls. In particular, as
our fee-based services for which we bill users grow, any failure
of our billing systems to accommodate the increasing number of
transactions and accurately bill users could adversely affect
our business and ability to collect revenue. These upgrades and
improvements will require a dedication of resources and in some
cases are likely to be complex. If we are unable to adapt our
systems in a timely manner to accommodate our growth, our
business may be adversely affected.
We have announced and are currently implementing on-going
strategic initiatives to better and more efficiently manage our
business. Implementing these initiatives requires significant
time and resource commitments from our senior management. In the
event that we are unable to effectively implement these
initiatives, we are unable to recruit or retain key employees as
a result of these initiatives or these initiatives do not yield
the anticipated benefits, our business may be adversely affected.
47
We
have dedicated considerable resources to provide a variety of
premium services, which may not prove to be successful in
generating significant revenue for us.
We offer fee-based enhancements to many of our free services,
including
e-mail,
personals, finance, games, music and sports. The development
cycles for these technologies are long and generally require
significant investment by us. We have and will continue to
invest in new products and services. Some of these new products
and services may not be profitable or may not meet anticipated
user adoption rates. We have previously discontinued certain
non-profitable premium services and may discontinue others. We
must however continue to provide new services that are
compelling to our users while continuing to develop an effective
method for generating revenues for such services. General
economic conditions as well as the rapidly evolving competitive
landscape may affect users willingness to pay for such
services. If we cannot generate revenues from these services
that are greater than the cost of providing such services, our
operating results could be harmed.
We
expect our operating expenses to continue to increase as we
attempt to expand the Yahoo! brand, fund product development,
develop media properties and acquire other businesses or
technologies, which could harm our operating
results.
We currently expect that our operating expenses will continue to
increase as we expand our operations in areas of expected
growth, continue to develop and extend the Yahoo! brand, fund
greater levels of product development, develop and commercialize
additional media properties and premium services, and acquire
and integrate complementary businesses and technologies. If our
expenses increase at a greater pace than our revenues, our
operating results could be harmed.
If we
are unable to retain our existing senior management and key
personnel and hire new highly skilled personnel, we may not be
able to execute our business plan.
We are substantially dependent on the continued services of our
senior management who have acquired specialized knowledge and
skills with respect to Yahoo! and its operations. The loss of
any of these individuals could harm our business. Our business
is also dependent on our ability to retain, attract, hire and
motivate talented, highly skilled personnel. Achieving this
objective may be difficult due to many factors, including the
intense competition for such highly skilled personnel in the
San Francisco Bay Area, where our corporate headquarters,
and the headquarters of several of our vertical and horizontal
competitors, are located, fluctuations in global economic and
industry conditions, changes in Yahoo!s management or
leadership, competitors hiring practices, and the
effectiveness of our compensation programs. If we do not succeed
in recruiting, retaining and motivating our key employees and in
attracting new key personnel, we may be unable to meet our
business plan and as a result, our stock price may decline.
More
individuals are utilizing non-PC devices to access the Internet,
and versions of our service developed or optimized for these
devices may not gain widespread adoption by users, manufacturers
or distributors of such devices.
The number of individuals who access the Internet through
devices other than a personal computer, such as personal digital
assistants, mobile telephones, televisions and set-top box
devices, has increased dramatically, and the trend is likely to
continue. Our services were originally designed for rich,
graphical environments such as those available on desktop and
laptop computers. The lower resolution, functionality and memory
associated with alternative devices currently available may make
the use of our services through such devices difficult, and the
versions of our service developed for these devices may not be
compelling to users, manufacturers or distributors of
alternative devices. As we have limited experience to date in
operating versions of our service developed or optimized for
users of alternative devices, and as new devices and new
platforms are continually being released, it is difficult to
predict the problems we may encounter in doing so, and we may
need to devote significant resources to the creation, support
and maintenance of such versions. If we are unable to attract
and retain a substantial number of alternative device
manufacturers, distributors and users to our online services, we
may fail to capture a sufficient share of an increasingly
important portion of the market for online services and may fail
to attract both advertisers and premium service subscribers.
48
We
plan to expand operations in international markets in which we
may have limited experience or rely on business
partners.
We plan to expand Yahoo! branded online properties and search
offerings in international markets. We have currently developed,
through joint ventures, strategic investments, subsidiaries and
branch offices, localized offerings in over 20 countries outside
of the United States. As we expand into new international
markets, we will have only limited experience in marketing and
operating our products and services in such markets. In other
instances, including our strategic investment in Alibaba, we may
rely on the efforts and abilities of foreign business partners
in such markets. Certain international markets may be slower
than domestic markets in adopting the Internet as an advertising
and commerce medium and so our operations in international
markets may not develop at a rate that supports our level of
investment.
In
international markets we compete with local Internet service
providers that may have competitive advantages.
In a number of international markets, especially those in Asia,
Europe and Latin America, we face substantial competition from
local Internet service providers and other portals that offer
search, communications and other commercial services. Many of
these companies have a dominant market share in their
territories and are owned by local telecommunications providers
which give them a competitive advantage. Local providers of
competing online services may also have a substantial advantage
over us in attracting users in their country due to more
established branding in that country, greater knowledge with
respect to the tastes and preferences of users residing in that
country
and/or their
focus on a single market. Further, the local providers may have
greater regulatory and operational flexibility than Yahoo! due
to the fact that we are subject to both United States and
foreign regulatory requirements. We must continue to improve our
local offerings, become more knowledgeable about our local users
and their preferences, deepen our relationships with our local
users as well as increase our branding and other marketing
activities in order to remain competitive and strengthen our
international market position.
Our
international operations are subject to increased risks which
could harm our business, operating results and financial
condition.
In addition to uncertainty about our ability to continue to
generate revenues from our foreign operations and expand our
international market position, there are certain risks inherent
in doing business internationally, including:
|
|
|
|
|
trade barriers and changes in trade regulations;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in developing, staffing and simultaneously managing
a large number of varying foreign operations as a result of
distance, language and cultural differences;
|
|
|
|
stringent local labor laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles;
|
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
political or social unrest or economic instability;
|
|
|
|
import or export restrictions;
|
|
|
|
seasonal volatility in business activity;
|
|
|
|
risks related to government regulation or required compliance
with local laws in certain jurisdictions, including those more
fully described above; and
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences.
|
One or more of these factors could harm our future international
operations and consequently, could harm our brand, business,
operating results and financial condition.
49
We may
be subject to legal liability for online services.
We host a wide variety of services that enable individuals and
businesses to exchange information, generate content, advertise
products and services, conduct business and engage in various
online activities on a domestic and an international basis. The
law relating to the liability of providers of these online
services for activities of their users is currently unsettled
both within the United States and internationally. Claims have
been threatened and have been brought against us for defamation,
negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, unlawful
activity, tort, including personal injury, fraud, or other
theories based on the nature and content of information that we
provide links to or that may be posted online or generated by
our users. In addition, Yahoo! has been and may again in the
future be subject to domestic or international actions alleging
that the availability of certain content within our services
violates laws in international jurisdictions. Defense of any
such actions could be costly and involve significant time and
attention of our management and other resources.
We also periodically enter into arrangements to offer
third-party products, services or content under the Yahoo! brand
or via distribution on the Yahoo! Properties, including stock
quotes and trading information. We may be subject to claims
concerning these products, services or content by virtue of our
involvement in marketing, branding, broadcasting or providing
access to them, even if we do not ourselves host, operate,
provide, or provide access to these products, services or
content. While our agreements with respect to these products,
services and content, often provide that we will be indemnified
against such liabilities, the ability to receive such
indemnification depends on the financial resources of the other
party to the agreement and any amounts received may not be
adequate to cover our liabilities.
It is also possible that, if any information provided directly
by us contains errors or is otherwise negligently provided to
users, third parties could make claims against us. For example,
we offer web-based
e-mail
services, which expose us to potential risks, such as
liabilities or claims resulting from unsolicited
e-mail, lost
or misdirected messages, illegal or fraudulent use of
e-mail, or
interruptions or delays in
e-mail
service. We may also face purported consumer class action suits
relating to our online services, including our fee-based
services. Investigating and defending any of these types of
claims is expensive, even to the extent that the claims are
without merit or do not ultimately result in liability, could
subject us to significant monetary liability or cause a change
in business practices that could impact our ability to compete.
We may
have difficulty scaling and adapting our existing technology
architecture to accommodate increased traffic and technology
advances or requirements of our users and
advertisers.
As one of the most highly trafficked websites on the Internet,
Yahoo! delivers a growing number of products, services and page
views to an increasing number of users around the world. In
addition, the products and services offered by Yahoo! have
expanded and changed significantly and are expected to continue
to expand and change rapidly in the future to accommodate new
technologies and new means of content delivery, such as rich
media audio and video. Our future success will depend on our
ability to adapt to rapidly changing technologies, to adapt our
products and services to evolving industry standards and to
improve the performance and reliability of our products and
services. Rapid increases in the levels or types of use of our
online properties and services could result in delays or
interruptions in our service.
Widespread adoption of new Internet, networking or
telecommunications technologies or other technological changes
could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our
services or infrastructure. The technology architectures
utilized for our services are highly complex and may not provide
satisfactory support in the future, as usage increases and
products and services expand, change and become more complex. In
the future, we may make changes to our architectures and
systems, including moving to completely new architectures and
systems. Such changes may be technologically challenging to
develop and implement, may take time to test and deploy, may
cause us to incur substantial costs or data loss, and may cause
users, advertisers, and affiliates to experience delays or
interruptions in our service. These changes, delays or
interruptions in our service may cause users, advertisers and
affiliates to become dissatisfied with our service and move to
competing providers of online services or to engage in
litigation. Further, to the extent that demands for our services
increase, we will need to expand our infrastructure, including
the capacity of our hardware servers and the sophistication of
our software. This expansion is likely to be expensive and
complex and require additional technical expertise. As we
acquire users who rely upon us for a wide
50
variety of services, it becomes more technologically complex and
costly to retrieve, store and integrate data that will enable us
to track each users preferences. Any difficulties
experienced in adapting our architectures and infrastructure to
accommodate increased traffic, to store user data and track user
preferences, together with the associated costs and potential
loss of traffic, could harm our operating results, cash flows
from operations and financial condition.
Our
business depends on the continued growth and maintenance of the
Internet infrastructure.
The success and the availability of our Internet-based products
and services depends in part upon the continued growth and
maintenance of the Internet infrastructure itself, including its
protocols, architecture, network backbone, data capacity and
security. Spam, viruses, worms, spyware, denial of service
attacks, phishing, and other acts of malice may affect not only
the Internets speed, reliability and availability but also
its continued desirability as a vehicle for commerce,
information and user engagement. If the Internet proves unable
to meet the new threats and increased demands placed upon it,
our business plans, user and advertiser relationships, site
traffic and revenues could be adversely affected.
New
technologies could block our advertisements or our search
marketing listings, which would harm our operating
results.
Technologies have been developed and are likely to continue to
be developed that can block the display of our advertisements or
our search marketing listings. Most of our revenues are derived
from fees paid to us by advertisers in connection with the
display of advertisements or our search marketing listings on
web pages. As a result, advertisement-blocking technology could
reduce the number of advertisements and search results that we
are able to deliver and, in turn, our advertising revenues and
operating results.
We
rely on third party providers for our principal Internet
connections and technologies, databases and services critical to
our properties and services, and any errors, failures or
disruption in the services provided by these third parties could
significantly harm our business and operating
results.
We rely on private third-party providers for our principal
Internet connections, co-location of a significant portion of
our data servers and network access. Any disruption, from
natural disasters, technology malfunctions, sabotage or other
factors, in the Internet or network access or co-location
services provided by these third-party providers or any failure
of these third-party providers to handle current or higher
volumes of use could significantly harm our business, operating
results and financial condition. We have little control over
these third-party providers, which increases our vulnerability
to disruptions or problems with their services. Any financial
difficulties experienced by our providers may have negative
effects on our business, the nature and extent of which we
cannot predict. We license technology and related databases from
third parties for certain elements of our properties, including,
among others, technology underlying the delivery of news, stock
quotes and current financial information, chat services, street
mapping and telephone listings, streaming capabilities and
similar services. We have experienced and expect to continue to
experience interruptions and delays in service and availability
for such elements. We also rely on a third-party provider for
key components of our
e-mail
service. Furthermore, we depend on hardware and software
suppliers for prompt delivery, installation and service of
servers and other equipment to deliver our services. Any errors,
failures, interruptions or delays experienced in connection with
these third-party technologies and information services could
negatively impact our relationship with users and adversely
affect our brand, our business and operating results.
We
rely on distribution agreements and relationships with various
third parties, and any failure to obtain or maintain such
distribution relationships on reasonable terms could impair our
ability to fully execute our business plan.
In addition to our relationships with Internet access providers,
to increase traffic for our offerings and make them more
available and attractive to advertisers and users, we have
certain distribution agreements and informal relationships with
operators of online networks and leading websites, software
companies, electronics companies, and computer manufacturers.
Depending on the distributor and the agreement, these
distribution arrangements may not be exclusive and may only have
a short term. Some of our distributors, particularly
distributors who are also
51
competitors or potential competitors, may not renew their
distribution agreements with us. In addition, as new methods for
accessing the Internet become available, including through
alternative devices, we may need to enter into amended
distributions agreements with existing distributors to cover the
new devices and agreements with additional distributors. In the
future, existing and potential distributors may not offer
distribution of our properties and services to us on reasonable
terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain distribution or to obtain
distribution on terms that are reasonable, we may not be able to
fully execute our business plan.
We
rely on third party providers of rich media products to provide
the technologies required to deliver rich media content to our
users, and any change in the licensing terms, costs,
availability or user acceptance of these products could
adversely affect our business.
We rely on leading providers of streaming media products to
license the software necessary to deliver rich media content to
our users. There can be no assurance that these providers will
continue to license these products to us on reasonable terms, or
at all. Our users are currently able to electronically download
copies of the software to play rich media free of charge, but
providers of rich media products may begin charging users for
copies of their player software or otherwise change their
business model in a manner that slows the widespread acceptance
of these products. In order for our rich media services to be
successful, there must be a large base of users of these rich
media products. We have limited or no control over the
availability or acceptance of rich media software, and to the
extent that any of these circumstances occur, our business may
be adversely affected.
If we
fail to prevent click fraud or if we choose to manage traffic
quality in a way that advertisers find unsatisfactory, we could
lose the confidence of our advertisers as well as face potential
litigation, government regulation or legislation, which could
adversely impact our business and profitability.
We are exposed to the risk of click fraud or other clicks that
advertisers may perceive as undesirable. If fraudulent activity
occurs and we are unable to detect and prevent it, or if we
choose to manage traffic quality in a way that advertisers find
unsatisfactory, the affected advertisers may experience or
perceive a reduced return on their investment in our advertising
programs which could lead the advertisers to become dissatisfied
with our advertising programs. This could damage our brand and
lead to a loss of advertisers and revenue. Advertiser
dissatisfaction has led to litigation alleging click fraud and
other types of traffic quality-related claims and could
potentially lead to further litigation or government regulation
of advertising. We may also issue refunds or credits as a result
of such activity. Any increase in costs due to any such
litigation, government regulation or legislation, refunds or
credits could negatively impact our profitability.
Interruptions,
delays or failures in the provision of our services could damage
our brand and harm our operating results.
Our operations are susceptible to outages and interruptions due
to fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, cyber
attacks, terrorist attacks and similar events. In addition, a
significant portion of our network infrastructure is located in
Northern California, an area subject to earthquakes. Despite our
implementation of network security measures, our servers are
vulnerable to computer viruses, worms, physical and electronic
break-ins, sabotage and similar disruptions from unauthorized
tampering with our computer systems. For example, we are
vulnerable to coordinated attempts to overload our systems with
data, resulting in denial or reduction of service to some or all
of our users for a period of time. We have experienced a
coordinated denial of service attack in the past, and may
experience such attempts in the future. We do not have multiple
site capacity for all of our services and some of our systems
are not fully redundant in the event of any such occurrence. In
an effort to reduce the likelihood of a geographical or other
disaster impacting our business, we have distributed and intend
to continue distributing our servers among additional data
centers located around the world. Failure to execute these
changes properly or in a timely manner could result in delays or
interruptions to our service, which could result in a loss of
users and damage to our brand, and harm our operating results.
We may not carry sufficient business interruption insurance to
compensate us for losses that may occur as a result of any
events, which cause interruptions in our service.
52
We may
be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our
goodwill, amortizable intangible assets or investments in equity
interests become impaired.
We are required under generally accepted accounting principles
to review our amortizable intangible assets and investments in
equity interests for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at
least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in
circumstances indicating that the carrying value of our
amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable include a
decline in stock price and market capitalization, and slower
growth rates in our industry. Factors that may be considered a
change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of an
investment in equity interest may not be recoverable include a
decline in the stock price of an equity investee that is a
public company or a decline in the operating performance of an
equity investee. We may be required to record a significant
charge to earnings in our consolidated financial statements
during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill,
amortizable intangible assets or investments in equity interests
is determined. This would adversely impact our results of
operations.
Our
stock price has been volatile historically and may continue to
be volatile regardless of our operating
performance.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue
to be subject to wide fluctuations. During the quarter ended
June 30, 2007, the closing sale prices of our common stock
on the Nasdaq Stock Market ranged from $26.61 to $33.61 per
share and the closing sale price on July 31, 2007 was
$23.25 per share. Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a
number of events and factors, such as quarterly variations in
operating results; announcements and implementations of
technological innovations or new services, upgrades and media
properties by us or our competitors; changes in financial
estimates and recommendations by securities analysts; the
operating and stock price performance of other companies that
investors may deem comparable to us; the operating performance
of companies in which we have an equity investment, including
Yahoo! Japan and Alibaba; and news reports relating to trends in
our markets or general economic conditions.
In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices
for Internet-related companies in particular, have experienced
volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating
performance of such companies. These broad market and industry
fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our stock,
regardless of our operating performance. Additionally,
volatility or a lack of positive performance in our stock price
may adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, all of
whom have been granted stock options or other stock-based awards.
Anti-takeover
provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to
acquire us.
We have adopted a stockholder rights plan and initially declared
a dividend distribution of one right for each outstanding share
of common stock to stockholders of record as of March 20,
2001. As a result of our two-for-one stock split effective
May 11, 2004, each share of common stock is now associated
with one-half of one right. Each right entitles the holder to
purchase one unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of
our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for $250
per unit. Under certain circumstances, if a person or group
acquires 15 percent or more of our outstanding common
stock, holders of the rights (other than the person or group
triggering their exercise) will be able to purchase, in exchange
for the $250 exercise price, shares of our common stock or of
any company into which we are merged having a value of $500. The
rights expire on March 1, 2011, unless extended by our
Board of Directors. Because the rights may substantially dilute
the stock ownership of a person or group attempting to take us
over without the approval of our Board of Directors, our rights
plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire
us (or a significant percentage of our outstanding capital
stock) without first negotiating with our Board of Directors
regarding that acquisition.
In addition, our Board of Directors has the authority to issue
up to 10 million shares of Preferred Stock (of which
2 million shares have been designated as Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock) and to determine the
price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions,
including voting rights, of those shares without any further
vote or action by the stockholders.
The rights of the holders of our common stock may be subject to,
and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of
any Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. The
issuance of Preferred Stock may have the
53
effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control
of Yahoo! without further action by the stockholders and may
adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of
our common stock. Further, certain provisions of our charter
documents, including provisions eliminating the ability of
stockholders to take action by written consent and limiting the
ability of stockholders to raise matters at a meeting of
stockholders without giving advance notice, may have the effect
of delaying or preventing changes in control or management of
Yahoo!, which could have an adverse effect on the market price
of our stock. In addition, our charter documents do not permit
cumulative voting, which may make it more difficult for a third
party to gain control of our Board of Directors. Further, we are
subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will prohibit us
from engaging in a business combination with an
interested stockholder for a period of three years
after the date of the transaction in which the person became an
interested stockholder, even if such combination is favored by a
majority of stockholders, unless the business combination is
approved in a prescribed manner. The application of
Section 203 also could have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change of control or management.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
Stock repurchase activity during the three months ended
June 30, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
that May Yet be
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of a
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
the Programs
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Program
|
|
|
(in 000s)(1)(2)
|
|
|
April 1 April 30,
2007
|
|
|
4,940,000
|
|
|
$
|
28.09
|
|
|
|
4,940,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,266,253
|
|
May 1 May 31, 2007
|
|
|
9,644,713
|
|
|
$
|
28.97
|
|
|
|
9,644,713
|
|
|
$
|
1,986,820
|
|
June 1 June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,986,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,584,713
|
|
|
$
|
28.67
|
|
|
|
14,584,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares repurchased in the three months ended June 30,
2007 were under our stock repurchase program that was announced
in October 2006 with an authorized level of $3.0 billion.
This program will expire in October 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
As of June 30, 2007, we had an unsettled structured stock
transaction in the amount of $250 million. The transaction
will mature in August 2007. On the maturity date, if the market
price of Yahoo! common stock is above $33.00, we will have our
investment returned with a premium and if the market price of
our common stock is at or below such pre-determined price, we
will repurchase 8.4 million shares of our common stock at
an effective buy-back price of $29.80 per share. Any repurchases
made under this structured stock repurchase transaction will be
reported in the third quarter of 2007 when they occur. This
outstanding structured stock repurchase transaction reduces the
dollar value of additional shares that may be repurchased under
our current program. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
On June 12, 2007, the Company held its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. At the meeting, the stockholders elected as
directors Terry Semel (with 1,125,706,488 shares voting
for, 76,923,424 against and 10,882,215 abstaining), Jerry Yang
(with 1,136,983,603 shares voting for, 68,421,173 against
and 8,107,351 abstaining), Roy Bostock (with
828,803,221 shares voting for, 376,632,150 against and
8,576,756 abstaining), Ronald Burkle (with
812,829,409 shares voting for, 391,815,737 against and
8,866,981 abstaining), Eric Hippeau (with
1,129,061,559 shares voting for, 75,771,859 against and
8,678,709 abstaining), Vyomesh Joshi (with
1,119,181,107 shares voting for, 86,119,901 against and
8,211,119 abstaining), Arthur Kern (with 808,076,204 shares
voting for, 396,563,022 against and 8,872,901 abstaining),
Robert Kotick (with 1,114,459,018 shares voting for,
90,846,979 against and 8,206,130 abstaining), Edward
54
Kozel (with 1,136,251,609 shares voting for, 69,064,772
against and 8,195,746 abstaining) and Gary Wilson (with
1,124,871,177 shares voting for, 80,545,028 against and
8,095,922 abstaining).
The stockholders approved amendments to the Companys
Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan (with
715,562,928 shares voting for, 320,168,169 against,
7,668,929 abstaining, and 170,112,101 broker non-votes).
The stockholders approved an amendment to the Companys
Amended and Restated 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (with
948,838,787 shares voting for, 87,352,282 against,
7,209,757 abstaining, and 170,111,301 broker non-votes).
The stockholders ratified the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2007 (with 1,198,451,555 shares voting
for, 7,722,306 against, and 7,338,226 abstaining).
The stockholders voted against the stockholder proposal
regarding pay-for-superior-performance (with
343,129,308 shares voting for, 670,817,226 against,
29,454,292 abstaining, and 170,111,301 broker non-votes).
The stockholders voted against the stockholder proposal
regarding Internet censorship (with 151,204,933 shares
voting for, 760,186,251 against, 132,009,642 abstaining, and
170,111,301 broker non-votes).
The stockholders voted against the stockholder proposal
regarding board committee on human rights (with
41,382,023 shares voting for, 856,745,147 against,
145,273,656 abstaining, and 170,111,301 broker non-votes).
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
55
Exhibits are incorporated herein by reference or are filed with
this report as indicated below (numbered in accordance with
Item 601 of
Regulation S-K):
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of Registrant (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 and incorporated herein
by reference.)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended Bylaws of Registrant
(Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed July 27, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Senior Indenture (Filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement
on
Form S-3,
Registration
No. 333-46458,
filed September 22, 2000 [the September 22, 2000
Form S-3]
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Subordinated Indenture
(Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the September 22, 2000
Form S-3
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.3**
|
|
Form of Senior Note.
|
|
4
|
.4**
|
|
Form of Subordinated Note.
|
|
4
|
.5**
|
|
Form of Certificate of Designation
for Preferred Stock (together with Preferred Stock certificate.)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of Deposit Agreement
(together with Depository Receipt) (Filed as Exhibit 4.6 to
the September 22, 2000
Form S-3
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.7**
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement
(together with Form of Warrant Certificate.)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Rights
Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2005, by and between Yahoo!
Inc. and Equiserve Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent
(Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed April 4, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Indenture, dated as of
April 9, 2003 by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank
National Association (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 10, 2003 [the April 10, 2003
Form 8-K]
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of April 9, 2003 among the Registrant and Credit
Suisse First Boston LLC (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the
April 10, 2003
Form 8-K
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated July 11, 2007 among the Registrant and certain
stockholders of Right Media Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to
the Registration Statement on
Form S-3,
Registration
No. 333-145045
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated
1995 Stock Plan (Filed as Annex A to the Registrants
definitive proxy statement filed on April 30, 2007 [the
2007 Proxy Statement]) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.23(A)*
|
|
Form of Stock Opinion Agreement
under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(B)*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award
Agreement under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock
Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(C)*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit
Award Agreement under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995
Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(D)*
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights
Award Agreement under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995
Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Filed as Annex B to the
2007 Proxy Statement) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Summary of Compensation Payable to
Named Executive Officers.
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)
and
15d-14(a) as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, dated August 8, 2007.
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)
and
15d-14(a) as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, dated August 8, 2007.
|
|
32
|
*
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 8, 2007.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
To be filed by a report on
Form 8-K
pursuant to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
or, where applicable, incorporated herein by reference from a
subsequent filing in accordance with Section 305(b)(2) of
the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. |
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
YAHOO! INC.
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2007
|
|
By: /s/ BLAKE
JORGENSEN
Blake
Jorgensen
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2007
|
|
By: /s/ MICHAEL
MURRAY
Michael
Murray
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
58
YAHOO!
INC.
Index to
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of Registrant (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 and incorporated herein
by reference.)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended Bylaws of Registrant
(Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed July 27, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Senior Indenture (Filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement
on
Form S-3,
Registration
No. 333-46458,
filed September 22, 2000 [the September 22, 2000
Form S-3]
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Subordinated Indenture
(Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the September 22, 2000
Form S-3
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.3**
|
|
Form of Senior Note.
|
|
4
|
.4**
|
|
Form of Subordinated Note.
|
|
4
|
.5**
|
|
Form of Certificate of Designation
for Preferred Stock (together with Preferred Stock certificate.)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of Deposit Agreement
(together with Depository Receipt) (Filed as Exhibit 4.6 to
the September 22, 2000
Form S-3
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.7**
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement
(together with Form of Warrant Certificate.)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Rights
Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2005, by and between Yahoo!
Inc. and Equiserve Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent
(Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed April 4, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Indenture, dated as of
April 9, 2003 by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank
National Association (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 10, 2003 [the April 10, 2003
Form 8-K]
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of April 9, 2003 among the Registrant and Credit
Suisse First Boston LLC (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the
April 10, 2003
Form 8-K
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated July 11, 2007 among the Registrant and certain
stockholders of Right Media Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to
the Registration Statement on
Form S-3,
Registration
No. 333-145045
and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated
1995 Stock Plan (Filed as Annex A to the Registrants
definitive proxy statement filed on April 30, 2007 [the
2007 Proxy Statement]) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.23(A)*
|
|
Form of Stock Opinion Agreement
under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(B)*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award
Agreement under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock
Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(C)*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit
Award Agreement under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995
Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(D)*
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights
Award Agreement under the Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated 1995
Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Yahoo! Inc. Amended and Restated
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Filed as Annex B to the
2007 Proxy Statement) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Summary of Compensation Payable to
Named Executive Officers.
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)
and
15d-14(a) as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, dated August 8, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)
and
15d-14(a) as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, dated August 8, 2007.
|
|
32
|
*
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 8, 2007.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
To be filed by a report on
Form 8-K
pursuant to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
or, where applicable, incorporated herein by reference from a
subsequent filing in accordance with Section 305(b)(2) of
the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. |
exv10w23xay
Exhibit 10.23(A)
YAHOO! INC.
1995 STOCK PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED JUNE 12, 2007)
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
1. |
|
Grant of Option. Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby grants to the
Optionee named in the Notice of Grant (the Optionee), an option (the Option) to purchase
the total number of shares of Common Stock (the Shares) set forth in the Notice of Grant, at
the exercise price per share set forth in the Notice of Grant (the Exercise Price) subject
to the terms, definitions and provisions of the 1995 Stock Plan, as amended (the Plan),
adopted by the Company, which is incorporated in this Agreement by reference. In the event of
a conflict between the terms of the Plan and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of the
Plan shall govern. Unless otherwise defined in this Agreement, the terms used in this
Agreement shall have the meanings defined in the Plan. |
|
|
|
If designated as an Incentive Stock Option in the Notice of Grant, this Option is intended
to qualify as an incentive stock option as such term is defined in Section 422 of the
Code. |
|
2. |
|
Exercise of Option. This Option shall be exercisable during its term in accordance with the
Vesting Schedule set forth in the Notice of Grant (the Vesting Schedule) and with the
provisions of Sections 9 and 10 of the Plan as follows: |
|
(a) |
|
This Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a share. |
|
|
(b) |
|
In the event of the Optionees death, disability or other
termination of employment, the exercisability of the Option is governed by
Sections 6, 7 and 8 below, subject to the limitations contained in Sections
2(i)(c) and (d). |
|
|
(c) |
|
In no event may this Option be exercised after the date of
expiration of the term of this Option as set forth in the Notice of Grant. |
|
|
(d) |
|
If designated as an Incentive Stock Option in the Notice of
Grant, in the event that this Option becomes exercisable at a time or times
which, when this Option is aggregated with all other incentive stock options
granted to the Optionee by the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, would
result in Shares having an aggregate fair market value (determined for each
Share as of the Date of Grant of the option covering such Share) in excess of
$100,000 becoming first available for purchase upon exercise of one or more
incentive stock options during any calendar year, the amount in excess of
$100,000 shall be treated as a Nonstatutory Stock Option, pursuant to Section
5(b) of the Plan. |
|
(a) |
|
This Option shall be exercisable by delivering notice to the
Company or a broker designated by the Company in such form and through such
delivery method as shall be acceptable to the Company or the designated broker,
as appropriate (the Exercise Notice). The Exercise Notice shall specify the
election to exercise the Option and the number of Shares in respect of which
the Option is being exercised, shall include such other representations and
agreements as to the holders investment intent with respect to such shares of
Common Stock as may be required by the Company pursuant to the provisions of
the Plan and applicable law, and shall be accompanied by payment of the
Exercise Price. This Option shall be deemed to be exercised upon receipt by
the Company or the designated broker of such notice accompanied by the Exercise
Price. |
|
|
(b) |
|
As a condition to the exercise of this Option, the Optionee
agrees to make adequate provision for federal, state or other tax withholding
obligations, if any, which arise upon the exercise of the Option or disposition
of Shares, whether by withholding, direct payment to the Company, or otherwise. |
|
|
(c) |
|
No Shares will be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Option
unless such issuance and such exercise shall comply with all relevant
provisions of law and the requirements of any Stock Exchange. Assuming such
compliance, for income tax purposes the Shares shall be considered transferred
to the Optionee on the date on which the Option is exercised with respect to
such Shares. |
3. |
|
Continuance of Employment/Service Required. The Vesting Schedule requires continued
employment or service through each applicable vesting date as a condition to the vesting of
the applicable installment of the Option and the rights and benefits under this Agreement.
Employment or service for only a portion of the vesting period, even if a substantial portion,
will not entitle the Optionee to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a termination
of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment or services as provided
in Sections 6, 7 and 8 below or under the Plan. |
|
4. |
|
Method of Payment. Payment of the Exercise Price shall be by any of, or a combination of,
the following methods at the election of the Optionee: (i) cash; (ii) check; (iii) surrender
of other shares of Common Stock of the Company which (a) in the case of shares initially
acquired from the Company (upon exercise of a stock option or otherwise), have been owned by
the Optionee for such period (if any) as may be required to avoid a charge to the Companys
earnings, and (b) have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the aggregate
exercise price of the Shares as to which said Option shall be exercised; or (iv) delivery of a
properly executed Exercise Notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to
deliver promptly to the Company the amount of sale or loan proceeds required to pay the
exercise price; provided that the |
2
|
|
Administrator may from time to time limit the availability of any non-cash payment
alternative. |
|
5. |
|
Restrictions on Exercise. This Option may not be exercised until such time as the Plan has
been approved by the stockholders of the Company, or if the issuance of such Shares upon such
exercise or the method of payment of consideration for such shares would constitute a
violation of any applicable federal or state securities or other law or regulation, including
any rule under Part 207 of Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations (Regulation G) as
promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board. As a condition to the exercise of this Option, the
Company may require the Optionee to make any representation and warranty to the Company as may
be required by any applicable law or regulation. |
|
6. |
|
Termination of Relationship. In the event of termination of the Optionees Continuous Status
as an Employee or Consultant, the Optionee may, to the extent otherwise so entitled at the
date of such termination (the Termination Date), exercise this Option during the Termination
Period set out in the Notice of Grant. To the extent that the Optionee was not entitled to
exercise this Option at the date of such termination, or if the Optionee does not exercise
this Option within the time specified in the Notice of Grant, the Option shall terminate.
Further, to the extent allowed by applicable law, if the Optionee is indebted to the Company
on the date of termination, the Optionees right to exercise this Option shall be suspended
until such time as the Optionee satisfies in full any such indebtedness. |
|
7. |
|
Disability of Optionee. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6 above, in the event of
termination of the Optionees Continuous Status as an Employee or Consultant as a result of
Total Disability, the Optionee may, but only within twelve (12) months from the date of
termination of employment (but in no event later than the date of expiration of the term of
this Option as set forth in Section 10 below), exercise the Option to the extent otherwise so
entitled at the date of such termination. To the extent that the Optionee was not entitled to
exercise the Option at the date of termination, or if the Optionee does not exercise such
Option (to the extent otherwise so entitled) within the time specified in this Agreement, the
Option shall terminate. |
|
8. |
|
Death of Optionee. In the event of the death of the Optionee during the period of the
Optionees Continuous Status as an Employee or Consultant, or within thirty (30) days
following the termination of the Optionees Continuous Status as an Employee or Consultant,
the Option may be exercised, at any time within twelve (12) months following the date of the
Optionees death (but in no event later than the date of expiration of the term of this Option
as set forth in Section 10 below), by the Optionees estate or by a person who acquired the
right to exercise the Option by bequest or inheritance, but only to the extent the Optionee
was entitled to exercise the Option at the date of death or, if earlier, the date of
termination of the Optionees Continuous Status as an Employee or Consultant. To the extent
that the Optionee was not entitled to exercise the Option at the date of death or termination,
as the case may be, or if the Optionees estate or the person who acquired the right to
exercise the Option by bequest or |
3
|
|
inheritance does not exercise such Option (to the extent otherwise so entitled) within the
time specified in this Agreement, the Option shall terminate. |
|
9. |
|
Non-Transferability of Option. This Option may not be transferred in any manner otherwise
than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution. The designation of a beneficiary does
not constitute a transfer. This Option may be exercised during the lifetime of the Optionee
only by the Optionee. The terms of this Option shall be binding upon the executors,
administrators, heirs, successors and assigns of the Optionee. |
|
10. |
|
Term of Option. This Option may be exercised only within the term set out in the Notice of
Grant, and may be exercised during such term only in accordance with the Plan and the terms of
this Option. |
|
11. |
|
No Additional Employment Rights. The Optionee understands and agrees that the vesting of
Shares pursuant to the Vesting Schedule is earned only by continuing as an Employee or
Consultant at the will of the Company (not through the act of being hired, being granted this
Option or acquiring Shares under this Agreement). The Optionee further acknowledges and
agrees that nothing in this Agreement, nor in the Plan which is incorporated in this Agreement
by reference, shall confer upon the Optionee any right with respect to continuation as an
Employee or Consultant with the Company, nor shall it interfere in any way with his or her
right or the Companys right to terminate his or her employment or consulting relationship at
any time, with or without cause. |
|
12. |
|
Notice of Disqualifying Disposition of Incentive Stock Option Shares. If the Option granted
to the Optionee in this Agreement is an Incentive Stock Option, and if the Optionee sells or
otherwise disposes of any of the Shares acquired pursuant to the Incentive Stock Option on or
before the later of (a) the date two years after the Date of Grant, or (b) the date one year
after transfer of such Shares to the Optionee upon exercise of the Incentive Stock Option, the
Optionee shall notify the Company in writing within thirty (30) days after the date of any
such disposition. The Optionee agrees that the Optionee may be subject to the tax withholding
provisions of Section 13 below in connection with such sale or disposition of such Shares. |
|
13. |
|
Tax Withholding. The Optionee shall pay to the Company promptly upon request, and in any
event at the time the Optionee recognizes taxable income in respect of the Option, an amount
equal to the taxes the Company determines it is required to withhold under applicable tax laws
with respect to the Option. Such payment may be made by any of, or a combination of, the
following methods: (i) cash or check; (ii) out of the Optionees current compensation; (iii)
surrender of other shares of Common Stock of the Company which (a) in the case of shares
initially acquired from the Company (upon exercise of a stock option or otherwise), have been
owned by the Optionee for such period (if any) as may be required to avoid a charge to the
Companys earnings, and (b) have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the
amount required to be withheld; (iv) by electing to have the Company withhold from the Shares
to be issued upon exercise of the Option that number of Shares having a Fair Market Value
equal to the minimum statutory amount required to be withheld or (v) delivery of a properly
executed Exercise Notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver
promptly to the Company the |
4
|
|
amount of sale or loan proceeds required to pay the amount required to be withheld; provided
that the Administrator may from time to time limit the availability of any non-cash payment
alternative. For these purposes, the Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld shall
be determined on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined (the
Tax Date). |
|
|
|
All elections by the Optionee to have Shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations
shall be made in writing in a form acceptable to the Administrator and shall be subject to
the following restrictions: |
|
(i) |
|
the election must be made on or prior to the applicable Tax Date; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
once made, the election shall be irrevocable as to the particular Shares of the
Option as to which the election is made; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
all elections shall be subject to the consent or disapproval of the
Administrator; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
if the Optionee is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the election must
comply with the applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act
and shall be subject to such additional conditions or restrictions as may be required
thereunder to qualify for the maximum exemption from Section 16 of the Exchange Act
with respect to Plan transactions. |
14 |
|
Notices. Any and all notices, designations, consents, offers, acceptances and any other
communications provided for herein shall be given in writing and shall be delivered either
personally or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, which shall be addressed, in
the case of the Company to both the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel of the
Company at the principal office of the Company and, in the case of the Optionee, to the
Optionees address appearing on the books of the Company or to the Optionees residence or to
such other address as may be designated in writing by the Optionee. |
|
15. |
|
Bound by Plan. By signing this Agreement, the Optionee acknowledges that he/she has received
a copy of the Plan and has had an opportunity to review the Plan and agrees to be bound by all
the terms and provisions of the Plan. |
|
16. |
|
Successors. The terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the Company, its successors and assigns, and of the Optionee and the beneficiaries, executors,
administrators, heirs and successors of the Optionee. |
|
17. |
|
Invalid Provision. The invalidity or unenforceability of any particular provision thereof
shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all
respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision had been omitted. |
|
18 |
|
Entire Agreement. This Agreement, the Notice of Grant and the Plan contain the entire
agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained
herein and therein and supersede all prior communications, representations and negotiations in
respect thereto. |
5
19. |
|
Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights of the Optionee hereunder shall be construed
and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. |
|
20. |
|
Headings. The headings of the Sections hereof are provided for convenience only and are not
to serve as a basis for interpretation or construction, and shall not constitute a part, of
this Agreement. |
|
21. |
|
Signature. This Agreement shall be deemed executed by the Company and the Optionee upon
execution by such parties of the Notice of Grant attached to this Agreement. |
6
exv10w23xby
Exhibit 10.23(B)
YAHOO! INC.
1995 STOCK PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED JUNE 12, 2007)
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT, (the Agreement), dated as of ___, 2007
(the Date of Grant), is made by and between Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company),
and ___(the Grantee).
WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Yahoo! Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended (the Plan),
pursuant to which the Company may grant Restricted Stock;
WHEREAS, the Company desires to grant to the Grantee the number of shares of Restricted Stock
provided for herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual agreements herein contained,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Award
(a) Grant of Restricted Stock. The Company hereby grants to the Grantee ___shares of
Restricted Stock (the Award) on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and as
otherwise provided in the Plan.
(b) Incorporation of Plan; Capitalized Terms. The provisions of the Plan are hereby
incorporated herein by reference. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, this Agreement
shall be construed in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and any capitalized terms not
otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the definitions set forth in the Plan. The
Administrator shall have final authority to interpret and construe the Plan and this Agreement and
to make any and all determinations thereunder, and its decision shall be binding and conclusive
upon the Grantee and his/her legal representative in respect of any questions arising under the
Plan or this Agreement.
Section 2. Terms and Conditions of Award
The grant of Restricted Stock provided in Section 1(a) shall be subject to the following
terms, conditions and restrictions:
(a) Ownership of Shares. Subject to the restrictions set forth in the Plan and this
Agreement, the Grantee shall possess all incidents of ownership of the Restricted Stock granted
hereunder, including the right to receive or reinvest dividends with respect to such Restricted
Stock and the right to vote such Restricted Stock.
(b) Restrictions. Restricted Stock and any interest therein, may not be sold, assigned,
transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of, except by will or the laws of
descent and distribution, during the Restricted Period. Any attempt to dispose of any
Restricted Stock in contravention of the above restriction shall be null and void and without
effect.
(c) Certificate; Book Entry Form; Legend. The Company shall issue the shares of Restricted
Stock either (i) in certificate form or (ii) in book entry form, registered in the name of the
Grantee, with legends, or notations, as applicable, referring to the terms, conditions and
restrictions applicable to the Award. Grantee agrees that any certificate issued for Restricted
Stock prior to the lapse of any outstanding restrictions relating thereto shall be inscribed with
the following legend:
This certificate and the shares of stock represented hereby are subject to the terms
and conditions, including forfeiture provisions and restrictions against transfer
(the Restrictions), contained in the Yahoo! Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended, and
an agreement entered into between the registered owner and the Company. Any attempt
to dispose of these shares in contravention of the Restrictions, including by way of
sale, assignment, transfer, pledge, hypothecation or otherwise, shall be null and
void and without effect.
(d) Lapse of Restrictions. [Vesting provisions to be determined at the time of grant.]
Upon the lapse of restrictions relating to any shares of Restricted Stock, the Company shall,
as applicable, either remove the notations on any such shares of Restricted Stock issued in
book-entry form or deliver to the Grantee or the Grantees personal representative a stock
certificate representing a number of shares of Common Stock, free of the restrictive legend
described in Section 2(c), equal to the number of shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which
such restrictions have lapsed. If certificates representing such Restricted Stock shall have
theretofore been delivered to the Grantee, such certificates shall be returned to the Company,
complete with any necessary signatures or instruments of transfer prior to the issuance by the
Company of such unlegended shares of Common Stock.
(e) Termination of Employment. Notwithstanding Section 2(b), in the event of the termination
of Grantees employment or service with the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary for any reason prior
to the lapsing of restrictions in accordance with Section 2(d) with respect to any portion of the
Restricted Stock granted hereunder, such portion of the Restricted Stock held by the Grantee shall
be automatically forfeited by the Grantee as of the date of termination.
Shares of Restricted Stock forfeited pursuant to this Section 2(e) shall be transferred to,
and reacquired by, the Company without payment of any consideration by the Company, and neither the
Grantee nor any of the Grantees successors, heirs, assigns or personal representatives shall
thereafter have any further rights or interests in such shares. If certificates for any such
shares containing restrictive legends shall have theretofore been delivered to the Grantee (or
his/her legatees or personal representative), such certificates shall be returned to the Company,
complete with any necessary signatures or instruments of transfer.
(f) Corporate Transactions. The following provisions shall apply to the corporate
transactions described below:
2
(i) In the event of a proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Award
will terminate and be forfeited immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed
transaction, unless otherwise provided by the Administrator.
(ii) In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Company, or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation, the Award shall be
assumed or substituted with an equivalent award by such successor corporation, parent or
subsidiary of such successor corporation; provided that the Administrator may determine, in
the exercise of its sole discretion, that in lieu of such assumption or substitution, the
Award shall be vested and non-forfeitable and any conditions or restrictions on the Award
shall lapse, as to all or any part of the Award, including Shares as to which the Award
would not otherwise be non-forfeitable.
(g) Income Taxes. The Grantee shall pay to the Company promptly upon request, and in any
event at the time the Grantee recognizes taxable income in respect of the Restricted Stock (whether
in connection with the grant or vesting of the Restricted Stock, the making of an election under
Section 83(b) of the Code in connection with the grant of the Restricted Stock as described in
Section 2(h) below, or otherwise), an amount equal to the taxes the Company determines it is
required to withhold under applicable tax laws with respect to the Restricted Stock. Such payment
may be made by any of, or a combination of, the following methods: (i) cash or check; (ii) out of
the Grantees current compensation; (iii) if permitted by the Administrator in its discretion,
surrender of other shares of Common Stock of the Company which (a) in the case of shares initially
acquired from the Company (upon exercise of a stock option or otherwise), have been owned by the
Grantee for such period (if any) as may be required to avoid a charge to the Companys earnings,
and (b) have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the amount required to be
withheld; or (iv) if permitted by the Administrator in its discretion, by electing to have the
Company withhold or otherwise reacquire from the Grantee Shares of Restricted Stock that vest
pursuant to the terms hereof having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum statutory amount
required to be withheld in connection with the vesting of such Shares. For these purposes, the
Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld or repurchased, as applicable, shall be determined
on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined (the Tax Date).
All elections by the Grantee to have Shares withheld or repurchased to satisfy tax withholding
obligations shall be made in writing in a form acceptable to the Administrator and shall be subject
to the following restrictions:
(i) the election must be made on or prior to the applicable Tax Date;
(ii) once made, the election shall be irrevocable as to the particular Shares as to which
the election is made;
(iii) all elections shall be subject to the consent or disapproval of the Administrator; and
(iv) if the Grantee is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the election must comply
with the applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange
3
Act and shall be subject to such additional conditions or restrictions as may be required
thereunder to qualify for the maximum exemption from Section 16 of the Exchange Act with
respect to Plan transactions.
(h) Section 83(b) Election. The Grantee hereby acknowledges that he or she may file an
election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed currently on the fair market value of
the shares of Restricted Stock (less any purchase price paid for the shares), provided that such
election must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service no later than thirty (30) days
after the grant of such Restricted Stock. The Grantee will seek the advice of his or her own tax
advisors as to the advisability of making such a Section 83(b) election, the potential consequences
of making such an election, the requirements for making such an election, and the other tax
consequences of the Restricted Stock award under federal, state, and any other laws that may be
applicable. The Company and its affiliates and agents have not and are not providing any tax
advice to the Grantee.
Section 3. Miscellaneous
(a) Notices. Any and all notices, designations, consents, offers, acceptances and any other
communications provided for herein shall be given in writing and shall be delivered either
personally or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, which shall be addressed, in the
case of the Company to both the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel of the Company at
the principal office of the Company and, in the case of the Grantee, to the Grantees address
appearing on the books of the Company or to the Grantees residence or to such other address as may
be designated in writing by the Grantee.
(b) No Right to Continued Employment. Nothing in the Plan or in this Agreement shall confer
upon the Grantee any right to continue in the employ of the Company, a Parent or any Subsidiary or
shall interfere with or restrict in any way the right of the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary,
which is hereby expressly reserved, to remove, terminate or discharge the Grantee at any time for
any reason whatsoever, with or without Cause and with or without advance notice.
(c) Bound by Plan. By signing this Agreement, the Grantee acknowledges that he/she has
received a copy of the Plan and has had an opportunity to review the Plan and agrees to be bound by
all the terms and provisions of the Plan.
(d) Successors. The terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the Company, its successors and assigns, and of the Grantee and the beneficiaries, executors,
administrators, heirs and successors of the Grantee.
(e) Invalid Provision. The invalidity or unenforceability of any particular provision thereof
shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects
as if such invalid or unenforceable provision had been omitted.
(f) Modifications. No change, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall
be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the parties hereto.
4
(g) Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the Plan contain the entire agreement and
understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein and therein
and supersede all prior communications, representations and negotiations in respect thereto.
(h) Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights of the Grantee hereunder shall be construed
and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
(i) Headings. The headings of the Sections hereof are provided for convenience only and are
not to serve as a basis for interpretation or construction, and shall not constitute a part, of
this Agreement.
(j) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto as of
the ___day of ___, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YAHOO! INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Insert Name] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printed Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
exv10w23xcy
Exhibit 10.23(C)
YAHOO! INC.
1995 STOCK PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED JUNE 12, 2007)
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT (the Agreement), dated as of ___, 2007
(the Date of Grant), is made by and between Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company),
and ___(the Grantee).
WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Yahoo! Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended (the Plan),
pursuant to which the Company may grant Restricted Stock Units;
WHEREAS, the Company desires to grant to the Grantee the number of Restricted Stock Units
provided for herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual agreements herein contained,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Award
(a) Grant of Restricted Stock Units. The Company hereby grants to the Grantee ___
Restricted Stock Units (the Award) on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and as
otherwise provided in the Plan.
(b) Incorporation of Plan; Capitalized Terms. The provisions of the Plan are hereby
incorporated herein by reference. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, this Agreement
shall be construed in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and any capitalized terms not
otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the definitions set forth in the Plan. The
Administrator shall have final authority to interpret and construe the Plan and this Agreement and
to make any and all determinations thereunder, and its decision shall be binding and conclusive
upon the Grantee and his/her legal representative in respect of any questions arising under the
Plan or this Agreement.
Section 2. Terms and Conditions of Award
The grant of Restricted Stock Units provided in Section 1(a) shall be subject to the following
terms, conditions and restrictions:
(a) Limitations on Rights Associated with Units. The Restricted Stock Units are bookkeeping
entries only. The Grantee shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company, no dividend rights
and no voting rights with respect to the Restricted Stock Units.
(b) Restrictions. Restricted Stock Units and any interest therein, may not be sold,
assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of, except by will or the laws
of descent and distribution, during the Restricted Unit Period. Any attempt to dispose of any
Restricted Stock Units in contravention of the above restriction shall be null and void and
without effect.
1
(c) Lapse of Restrictions. [Vesting provisions to be determined at the time of grant.]
(d) Timing and Manner of Payment of Restricted Stock Units.
[As soon as practicable after the date any Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award become
non-forfeitable (the Payment Date), such Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in a lump sum cash
payment equal in the aggregate to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Payment Date multiplied
by the number of such Restricted Stock Units that become non-forfeitable upon that Payment Date.
Neither the Grantee nor any of the Grantees successors, heirs, assigns or personal representatives
shall have any further rights or interests in any Restricted Stock Units that are so paid.]
[As soon as practicable after the date any Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award become
non-forfeitable (the Payment Date), such Restricted Stock Units shall be paid by the Company
delivering to the Grantee, a number of Shares equal to the number of Restricted Stock Units that
become non-forfeitable upon that Payment Date. The Company shall issue the Shares either (i) in
certificate form or (ii) in book entry form, registered in the name of the Grantee. Delivery of
any certificates will be made to the Grantees last address reflected on the books of the Company
and its Subsidiaries unless the Company is otherwise instructed in writing. Neither the Grantee
nor any of the Grantees successors, heirs, assigns or personal representatives shall have any
further rights or interests in any Restricted Stock Units that are so paid. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Company shall have no obligation to issue Shares in payment of the Restricted Stock
Units unless such issuance and such payment shall comply with all relevant provisions of law and
the requirements of any Stock Exchange.]
[As soon as practicable after the date any Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award become
non-forfeitable (the Payment Date), such Restricted Stock Units shall be paid, at the Companys
option, (i) in a lump sum cash payment equal in the aggregate to the Fair Market Value of a Share
on the Payment Date multiplied by the number of such Restricted Stock Units that become
non-forfeitable upon that Payment Date or (ii) by the Company delivering to the Grantee a number of
Shares equal to the number of Restricted Stock Units that become non-forfeitable upon that Payment
Date. If the Restricted Stock Units are paid in Shares, the Company shall issue the Shares either
(i) in certificate form or (ii) in book entry form, registered in the name of the Grantee.
Delivery of any certificates will be made to the Grantees last address reflected on the books of
the Company and its Subsidiaries unless the Company is otherwise instructed in writing. Neither
the Grantee nor any of the Grantees successors, heirs, assigns or personal representatives shall
have any further rights or interests in any Restricted Stock Units that are so paid.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall have no obligation to issue
Shares in payment of the Restricted Stock Units unless such issuance and such payment shall comply
with all relevant provisions of law and the requirements of any Stock Exchange.]
(e) Termination of Employment. In the event of the termination of Grantees employment or
service with the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary for any reason prior to the lapsing of the
restrictions in accordance with Section 2(c) hereof with respect to any of the Restricted Stock
Units granted hereunder , such portion of the Restricted Stock Units held by Grantee shall be
automatically forfeited by the Grantee as of the date of termination. Neither the Grantee nor any
of the Grantees successors, heirs, assigns or personal representatives shall have any rights or
interests in any Restricted Stock Units that are so forfeited.
2
(f) Corporate Transactions. The following provisions shall apply to the corporate
transactions described below:
(i) In the event of a proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Award
will terminate and be forfeited immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed
transaction, unless otherwise provided by the Administrator.
(ii) In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Company, or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation, the Award shall be
assumed or substituted with an equivalent award by such successor corporation, parent or
subsidiary of such successor corporation; provided that the Administrator may determine, in
the exercise of its sole discretion in connection with a transaction that constitutes a
permissible distribution event under Section 409A(a)(2)(v) of the Code, that in lieu of such
assumption or substitution, the Award shall be vested and non-forfeitable and any conditions
or restrictions on the Award shall lapse, as to all or any part of the Award, including
Restricted Stock Units as to which the Award would not otherwise be non-forfeitable.
(g) Income Taxes. Except as provided in the next sentence, the Company shall withhold and/or
reacquire a number of Shares issued in payment of (or otherwise issuable in payment of, as the case
may be) the Restricted Stock Units having a Fair Market Value equal to the taxes that the Company
determines it or the Employer is required to withhold under applicable tax laws with respect to the
Restricted Stock Units (with such withholding obligation determined based on any applicable minimum
statutory withholding rates). In the event the Company cannot (under applicable legal, regulatory,
listing or other requirements, or otherwise) satisfy such tax withholding obligation in such method
or in the event that the Restricted Stock Units are paid in cash (as opposed to Shares), the
Company may satisfy such withholding by any one or combination of the following methods: (i) by
requiring the Grantee to pay such amount in cash or check; (ii) by reducing the amount of any cash
otherwise payable to Grantee with respect to the Restricted Stock Units; (iii) by deducting such
amount out of any other compensation otherwise payable to the Grantee; and/or (iv) by allowing the
Grantee to surrender shares of Common Stock of the Company which (a) in the case of shares
initially acquired from the Company (upon exercise of a stock option or otherwise), have been owned
by the Grantee for such period (if any) as may be required to avoid a charge to the Companys
earnings, and (b) have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the amount required to
be withheld;. For these purposes, the Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld or
repurchased, as applicable, shall be determined on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld
is to be determined.
Section 3. Miscellaneous
(a) Notices. Any and all notices, designations, consents, offers, acceptances and any other
communications provided for herein shall be given in writing and shall be delivered either
personally or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, which shall be addressed, in the
case of the Company to both the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel of the Company at
the principal office of the Company and, in the case of the Grantee, to the Grantees address
appearing on the books of the Company or to the Grantees residence or to such other address as may
be designated in writing by the Grantee.
3
(b) No Right to Continued Employment. Nothing in the Plan or in this Agreement shall confer
upon the Grantee any right to continue in the employ of the Company, a Parent or any Subsidiary or
shall interfere with or restrict in any way the right of the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary,
which is hereby expressly reserved, to remove, terminate or discharge the Grantee at any time for
any reason whatsoever, with or without Cause and with or without advance notice.
(c) Bound by Plan. By signing this Agreement, the Grantee acknowledges that he/she has
received a copy of the Plan and has had an opportunity to review the Plan and agrees to be bound by
all the terms and provisions of the Plan.
(d) Successors. The terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the Company, its successors and assigns, and of the Grantee and the beneficiaries, executors,
administrators, heirs and successors of the Grantee.
(e) Invalid Provision. The invalidity or unenforceability of any particular provision thereof
shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects
as if such invalid or unenforceable provision had been omitted.
(f) Modifications. No change, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall
be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the parties hereto.
(g) Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the Plan contain the entire agreement and
understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein and therein
and supersede all prior communications, representations and negotiations in respect thereto.
(h) Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights of the Grantee hereunder shall be construed
and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
(i) Headings. The headings of the Sections hereof are provided for convenience only and are
not to serve as a basis for interpretation or construction, and shall not constitute a part, of
this Agreement.
(j) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto as of
the ___day of ___, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YAHOO! INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Insert Name] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printed Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
exv10w23xdy
Exhibit 10.23(D)
YAHOO! INC.
1995 STOCK PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED JUNE 12, 2007)
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AWARD AGREEMENT (the Agreement), dated as of ___,
2007 (the Date of Grant), is made by and between Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), and ___(the Grantee).
WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Yahoo! Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended (the Plan),
pursuant to which the Company may grant Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs);
WHEREAS, the Company desires to grant to the Grantee the number of SARs provided for herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual agreements herein contained,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights Award
(a) Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights. The Company hereby grants to the Grantee ___
SARs (the Award) at a grant price per SAR of
$___ per share (the Grant Price). The Award is
granted on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and as otherwise provided in the
Plan.
(b) Incorporation of Plan; Capitalized Terms. The provisions of the Plan are hereby
incorporated herein by reference. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, this Agreement
shall be construed in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and any capitalized terms not
otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the definitions set forth in the Plan. The
Administrator shall have final authority to interpret and construe the Plan and this Agreement and
to make any and all determinations thereunder, and its decision shall be binding and conclusive
upon the Grantee and his/her legal representative in respect of any questions arising under the
Plan or this Agreement.
Section 2. Terms and Conditions of Award
The grant of SARs provided in Section 1(a) shall be subject to the following terms, conditions
and restrictions:
(a) Non-Transferability of Award. The Award, the SARs subject to the Award and any interest
therein, may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of,
except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, prior to the time (if any) that the SARs
are actually paid pursuant to the terms hereof. Any attempt to dispose of any SARs in
contravention of the above restriction shall be null and void and without effect.
(b) Vesting of SARs. Subject to Sections 2(d) and 2(e) below, the SARs subject to the Award
shall vest with respect to [specify vesting schedule]. The vesting schedule requires continued
employment or service through each applicable vesting date as a condition to the
1
vesting of the applicable installment of the Award and the rights and benefits under this
Agreement. Employment or service for only a portion of the vesting period, even if a substantial
portion, will not entitle the Grantee to any proportionate vesting or avoid or mitigate a
termination of rights and benefits upon or following a termination of employment or services as
provided in Sections 2(d) below or under the Plan.
(c) Exercise and Payment of SARs. On the date one or more SARs subject to the Award vest, the
SARs shall be paid by the Company delivering to the Grantee (subject to tax withholding as provided
in Section 2(f)) a number of Shares equal to the number of SARs that vested on that date. The
Company shall issue such Shares either (i) in certificate form or (ii) in book entry form,
registered in the name of the Grantee. Delivery of any certificates will be made to the Grantees
last address reflected on the books of the Company and its Subsidiaries unless the Company is
otherwise instructed in writing. Delivery of the shares will be made on or as soon as practical
after the date the SARs become vested, and in all cases no later than two and one-half months after
such vesting date. Neither the Grantee nor any of the Grantees successors, heirs, assigns or
personal representatives shall have any further rights or interests in any SARs that are so paid.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall have no obligation to issue Shares in payment of
the SARs unless such issuance and such payment shall comply with all relevant provisions of law and
the requirements of any Stock Exchange.
(d) Termination of Employment. In the event of the termination of the Grantees employment or
service with the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary for any reason prior to the vesting of the Award
in accordance with Section 2(b) hereof with respect to any of the SARs granted hereunder, such SARs
held by Grantee shall be automatically forfeited by the Grantee as of the date of termination.
Neither the Grantee nor any of the Grantees successors, heirs, assigns or personal representatives
shall have any rights or interests in any SARs that are so forfeited.
(e) Corporate Transactions. The following provisions shall apply to the corporate
transactions described below:
(i) In the event of a proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Award
will terminate and be forfeited immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed
transaction, unless otherwise provided by the Administrator.
(ii) In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Company, or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation, the Award shall be
assumed or substituted with an equivalent award by such successor corporation, parent or
subsidiary of such successor corporation; provided that the Administrator may determine, in
the exercise of its sole discretion in connection with a transaction that constitutes a
permissible distribution event under Section 409A(a)(2)(v) of the Code, that in lieu of such
assumption or substitution, the Award shall be vested and non-forfeitable, as to all or any
part of the Award, including SARs as to which the Award would not otherwise be
non-forfeitable.
(f) Income Taxes. Except as provided in the next sentence, the Company shall withhold and/or
reacquire a number of Shares issued in payment of (or otherwise issuable in payment of, as the case
may be) the SARs having a Fair Market Value equal to the taxes that the Company determines it or
the Employer is required to withhold under applicable tax laws with respect to the SARs (with such
withholding obligation determined based on any applicable
2
minimum statutory withholding rates). In the event the Company cannot (under applicable
legal, regulatory, listing or other requirements, or otherwise) satisfy such tax withholding
obligation in such method or in the event that the SARs are for any reason to be settled in cash
(as opposed to Shares), the Company may satisfy such withholding by any one or combination of the
following methods: (i) by requiring the Grantee to pay such amount in cash or check; (ii) by
reducing the amount of any cash otherwise payable to the Grantee with respect to the SARs; (iii) by
deducting such amount out of any other compensation otherwise payable to the Grantee; and/or (iv)
by allowing the Grantee to surrender shares of Common Stock of the Company which (a) in the case of
shares initially acquired from the Company (upon exercise of a stock option or otherwise), have
been owned by the Grantee for such period (if any) as may be required to avoid a charge to the
Companys earnings, and (b) have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the amount
required to be withheld. For these purposes, the Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld or
repurchased, as applicable, shall be determined on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld
is to be determined.
Section 3. Miscellaneous
(a) Notices. Any and all notices, designations, consents, offers, acceptances and any other
communications provided for herein shall be given in writing and shall be delivered either
personally or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, which shall be addressed, in the
case of the Company to both the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel of the Company at
the principal office of the Company and, in the case of the Grantee, to the Grantees address
appearing on the books of the Company or to the Grantees residence or to such other address as may
be designated in writing by the Grantee.
(b) No Right to Continued Employment. Nothing in the Plan or in this Agreement shall confer
upon the Grantee any right to continue in the employ of the Company, a Parent or any Subsidiary or
shall interfere with or restrict in any way the right of the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary,
which is hereby expressly reserved, to remove, terminate or discharge the Grantee at any time for
any reason whatsoever, with or without Cause and with or without advance notice.
(c) Bound by Plan. By signing this Agreement, the Grantee acknowledges that he/she has
received a copy of the Plan and has had an opportunity to review the Plan and agrees to be bound by
all the terms and provisions of the Plan.
(d) Successors. The terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the Company, its successors and assigns, and of the Grantee and the beneficiaries, executors,
administrators, heirs and successors of the Grantee.
(e) Invalid Provision. The invalidity or unenforceability of any particular provision thereof
shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects
as if such invalid or unenforceable provision had been omitted.
(f) Modifications. No change, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall
be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the parties hereto.
(g) Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the Plan contain the entire agreement and
understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein and therein
and supersede all prior communications, representations and negotiations in respect thereto.
3
(h) Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights of the Grantee hereunder shall be construed
and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
(i) Headings. The headings of the Sections hereof are provided for convenience only and are
not to serve as a basis for interpretation or construction, and shall not constitute a part, of
this Agreement.
(j) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto as of
the ___day of ___, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
YAHOO! INC.
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
Its: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Insert Name] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printed Name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
exv10w25
Exhibit 10.25
Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers
Base Salary. The Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Inc.
(Yahoo!) has previously approved the annual base salaries of Yahoo!s Named Executive Officers
identified in Yahoo!s Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April
30, 2007 who are currently employed by Yahoo!, of Yahoo!s principal executive officer, and of
Yahoo!s principal financial officer (together, the Named Executive Officers). The following
table shows the current annualized base salary rate for 2007 for each of the Named Executive
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Salary |
|
Jerry Yang
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Yahoo |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan Decker
President |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake Jorgensen
Chief Financial Officer |
|
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Callahan
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
Bonus. In addition to receiving base salary, Yahoo!s Named Executive Officers are also
generally eligible to receive an annual bonus.
For each of 2007 through 2009, Ms. Decker will be eligible to receive an annual target cash bonus
of $1 million. Mr. Jorgensen is eligible to receive an annual target cash bonus of 100% of his
base salary for the year. Mr. Callahan is also generally eligible to receive an annual bonus. In
each case, the amount of an executives annual bonus, if any, will be determined by the Committee
based on the executives and Yahoo!s performance for the relevant year.
Long-Term Incentives. The Named Executive Officers are also eligible to receive equity-based
incentives and other awards from time to time in the discretion of the Committee. Equity-based
incentives granted by Yahoo! to the Named Executive Officers are reported on Form 4 filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Jerry Yang, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Yahoo! Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Jerry Yang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry Yang |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Blake Jorgensen, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Yahoo! Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Blake Jorgensen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blake Jorgensen |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32
EXHIBIT 32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Yahoo! (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Jerry Yang, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Blake Jorgensen, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his and her knowledge,
respectively, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jerry Yang |
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Jerry Yang
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Dated:
|
|
August 8, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Blake Jorgensen |
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Blake Jorgensen |
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Dated:
|
|
August 8, 2007 |
|
|
The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.